Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Bush

Filing 38

ORDER VACATING HEARING AND DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE SETTLEMENT AND REOPEN ACTION by Judge Alsup finding as moot 37 Motion to Set Aside (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/17/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC., Plaintiff, v. MALAYTHONG BUSH a/k/a MALAYTHONG SINGH, individually and d/b/a LUCKY PIZZA, Defendants. / ORDER VACATING HEARING AND DENYING AS MOOT PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO SET ASIDE SETTLEMENT AND REOPEN ACTION No. C 09-00454 WHA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. has sued defendant Malaythong Bush for allegedly exhibiting at a commercial establishment a pay-per-view fight telecast to which plaintiff claims to have owned the exclusive domestic commercial exhibition rights. On September 17, 2009, plaintiff filed a "notice of settlement" stating that the parties had reached a settlement of this action and would file a stipulation of dismissal on or before March 1, 2010 (Dkt. No. 36). Now plaintiff has filed a "motion to set aside settlement and reopen action" on the grounds that defendants have allegedly failed to honor the terms of the settlement agreement. However, no fully executed and final version of a stipulation of settlement or dismissal was ever filed and the 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 action was accordingly never closed. Plaintiff's motion is therefore DENIED AS MOOT. All deadlines set by the case management order (Dkt. No. 33) remain in effect. The hearing scheduled for February 25, 2010, is VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: February 17, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?