625 3rd Street Associates, LP v. Alliant Credit Union et al

Filing 213

PROPOSED VERDICT FORM FOR OCTOBER 5 CHARGING CONFERENCE (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2010)

625 3rd Street Associates, LP v. Alliant Credit Union et al

Doc. 213

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

625 3RD STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P., a California limited partnership, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF THE NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION, in its capacity as liquidating agent for the Kaiperm Federal Credit Union, KAIPERM FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, a federal credit union, and STANLEY ABRAMS, an individual, Defendants. / PROPOSED VERDICT FORM FOR CHARGING CONFERENCE
AT CLOSE OF EVIDENCE ON TUESDAY, OCTOBER 5, 2010 PROVIDED TO COUNSEL ON OCTOBER 4, 2010, AT 11:45 A.M.

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

No. C 09-00564 WHA No. C 09-03820 WHA

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2. 1.

YOUR ANSWERS MUST BE UNANIMOUS. Has plaintiff 625 3rd Street proven that either of the following defendants committed

fraud in connection with the sale-and-leaseback transaction? Yes Kaiperm Stanley Abrams ___________ ___________ No ____________ ____________

If you have answered "yes" to Question 1, state the amount of damages proven by

plaintiff, if any, by reason of any proven fraud. As to Kaiperm $________________ As to Stanley Abrams $________________

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

3.

Has plaintiff 625 3rd Street proven that defendant Kaiperm breached any warranties in Yes ___________ No ___________

the contract?

4.

If you have answered "yes" to Question 3, state the amount of damages proven by $________________

plaintiff, if any, by reason of breach of warranty.

5.

If you have awarded damages under both Questions 3 and 4, then state the amount of

damages proven by plaintiff, eliminating any double-counting of damage items. (This applies only to Kaiperm.) As to Kaiperm $________________

CONCLUSION ONCE YOU HAVE ANSWERED ALL YOU NEED TO ANSWER, THE FOREPERSON SHOULD SIGN
AND DATE THIS FORM.

THEN SEND OUT A NOTE THAT YOU HAVE REACHED A VERDICT.

Dated: October __, 2010.

Foreperson 2