625 3rd Street Associates, LP v. Alliant Credit Union et al

Filing 218

VERDICT FORM (Circulated to counsel after the charging conference and before closings) (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/5/2010)

625 3rd Street Associates, LP v. Alliant Credit Union et al

Doc. 218

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

625 3RD STREET ASSOCIATES, L.P., a California limited partnership, Plaintiff, v. BOARD OF THE NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION, in its capacity as liquidating agent for the Kaiperm Federal Credit Union, KAIPERM FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, a federal credit union, and STANLEY ABRAMS, an individual, Defendants. / VERDICT FORM (CIRCULATED TO COUNSEL AFTER THE CHARGING CONFERENCE AND BEFORE CLOSINGS) No. C 09-00564 WHA No. C 09-03820 WHA

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Dockets.Justia.com

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 1.

YOUR ANSWERS MUST BE UNANIMOUS. Has plaintiff 625 3rd Street proven that either of the following defendants committed

fraud in connection with the sale-and-leaseback transaction? Kaiperm Stanley Abrams 2. Yes _______ _______ No _______ _______

If you have answered "yes" to Question 1, state the amount of damages proven by

plaintiff, if any, by reason of any proven fraud. Remember, any damage you find against Mr. Abrams must also be found as against Kaiperm (in addition to any other fraud damages found by you against Kaiperm). As to Kaiperm 3. $________________ As to Stanley Abrams $________________

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

If you have awarded damages under Question 2, then state whether the fraud was oral Oral _______ Written _______ Both _______

or written or both. 4.

Has plaintiff 625 3rd Street proven that defendant Kaiperm breached any warranties in Yes _______ No _______

the contract?

5.

If you have answered "yes" to Question 4, state the amount of damages proven by $________________

plaintiff, if any, by reason of breach of warranty. 6.

If you have awarded damages against Kaiperm under both Questions 2 and 5, then state

the total amount of damages proven by plaintiff, eliminating any double-counting of damage items. In other words, state the total amount of damage items, counting each item only once. $________________ ONCE YOU HAVE ANSWERED ALL YOU NEED TO ANSWER, THE FOREPERSON SHOULD SIGN
AND DATE THIS FORM.

THEN SEND OUT A NOTE THAT YOU HAVE REACHED A VERDICT.

Dated: October __, 2010.

Foreperson

2