Crosthwaite et al v. Statewide Concrete Pumping, Inc. et al

Filing 24

CLERK'S JUDGMENT in favor of Heavy & Highway Committee, Operating Engineers & Participating Employers Pre-Apprenticeship, Apprentice & Journeymen Affirmative Action Training Fund, Operating Engineers Local 3, Pension Trust Fund for Operating Eng ineers, Pensioned Operating Engineers' Health & Welfare Fund, Gil Crosthwaite, Russ Burns against Statewide Concrete Pumping, Inc., Tyrone Anthony Evans. Judgment is entered in favor of plaintiffs and against defendants in conformity with the Court's order of June 11, 2009. (tl, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/15/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. STATEWIDE CONCRETE PUMPING, INC., Defendants. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GIL CROSTHWAITE, et al., Plaintiffs, No. CV-09-0574 MMC JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE () Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. (X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED 1. To the extent plaintiffs seek an order compelling defendants to submit to an audit of their records for the period of October 1, 2006 through the date of the audit, the motion is hereby GRANTED. Specifically, defendants are hereby ORDERED to submit to an audit within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. 2. To the extent plaintiffs seek an order directing defendants to pay all amounts found by plaintiffs to be due on audit, the motion is hereby DENIED as premature and without prejudice to plaintiffs' filing an action to recover any amounts claimed to be due under the terms of the parties' Bargaining Agreement, if there exists at that time a case or controversy with respect to a failure to pay. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. To the extent plaintiffs seek an order awarding attorneys' fees in the amount of $3673 and costs in the amount of $502.21, for a total sum of $4175.21, the Court finds the hourly rates sought and the number of hours expended reasonable and hereby GRANTS the motion. Dated: June 15,2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk Deputy Clerk By: Tracy Lucero 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. STATEWIDE CONCRETE PUMPING, INC., Defendants. / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA GIL CROSTHWAITE, et al., Plaintiffs, No. CV-09-0574 MMC JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE () Jury Verdict. This action came before the Court for a trial by jury. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict. (X) Decision by Court. This action came to trial or hearing before the Court. The issues have been tried or heard and a decision has been rendered. IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED 1. To the extent plaintiffs seek an order compelling defendants to submit to an audit of their records for the period of October 1, 2006 through the date of the audit, the motion is hereby GRANTED. Specifically, defendants are hereby ORDERED to submit to an audit within thirty (30) days of the date of this order. 2. To the extent plaintiffs seek an order directing defendants to pay all amounts found by plaintiffs to be due on audit, the motion is hereby DENIED as premature and without prejudice to plaintiffs' filing an action to recover any amounts claimed to be due under the terms of the parties' Bargaining Agreement, if there exists at that time a case or controversy with respect to a failure to pay. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3. To the extent plaintiffs seek an order awarding attorneys' fees in the amount of $3673 and costs in the amount of $502.21, for a total sum of $4175.21, the Court finds the hourly rates sought and the number of hours expended reasonable and hereby GRANTS the motion. Dated: June 15,2009 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk Deputy Clerk By: Tracy Lucero

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?