Bhalla v. Barrett et al

Filing 3

ORDER to show cause by 3/23/09 why case should not be transferred to the Eastern District. (vrwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/5/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge IT IS SO ORDERED. Petitioner requests de novo review of his application for naturalization pursuant to 8 USC 1447(b). Under 1447(b), venue In his IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA DANESH KUMAR BHALLA, Petitioner, v ROBIN BARRETT et al Respondents. / No C 09-0579 VRW ORDER is proper in the "district in which the applicant resides." complaint, petitioner states that he resides in "San Francisco District," Doc #1 at 3, but the documents attached to petitioner's complaint indicate he lives in Tracy, a city in the Eastern District of California. See Doc #1 Exh 2. Accordingly, the court hereby ORDERS petitioner to SHOW CAUSE in writing, on or before March 23, 2009, why the court should not transfer his petition to the district court for the Eastern District of California.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?