NorthPeak Wireless, LLC v. 3Com Corporation et al

Filing 604

ORDER of dismissal as to defendant Watchguard Tech. only. Signed by Judge Susan Illston on 9/23/15. (tfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/23/2015)

NIX PATTERSON & ROACH, L.L.P.
1 DEREK T. GILLILAND (pro hac vice)
2 [e-mail]
EDWARD CHIN (pro hac vice)
3 [e-mail]
CHRISTIAN HURT (pro hac vice)
4 [e-mail]
KIRK VOSS (pro hac vice)
5
[e-mail]
6 WINN CUTLER (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
7 ROSS LEONOUDAKIS (pro hac vice)
[e-mail]
8 5215 N. O’Connor Blvd., Suite 1900
Irving, Texas 75039
9
Telephone: [phone]
10 Facsimile: [phone]
11
(Additional Counsel on Signature Page)
12
13

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

14

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

15

SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16 NORTHPEAK WIRELESS, LLC,
17
18

Plaintiff,
vs.

19 3COM CORPORATION, et al.,
20

Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:09-cv-00602-SI

PROPOSED ORDER DISMISSING
DEFENDANT WATCHGUARD
TECHNOLOGIES, INC. WITH
PREJUDICE

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28 Proposed Order Dismissing Defendant Watchguard With Prejudice
Case No. No. 3:09-CV-00602-Si

1

Having considered Plaintiff NORTHPEAK WIRLESS, LLC.’S (“NorthPeak”) and

2 Defendant WATCHGUARD TECHNOLOGIES, INC.’s (“Watchguard”) Joint Stipulation of
3 Dismissal With Prejudice as to claims and counterclaims asserted by NorthPeak and
4 Watchguard, it is hereby
5
6

ORDERED that NorthPeak’s claims against Watchguard are dismissed with prejudice,
with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.

7
8
9
10

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Watchguard’s counterclaims against NorthPeak are
dismissed with prejudice, with each party to bear its own costs and attorneys’ fees.
September
23rd
SIGNED this _____ day of _________________, 2015.

11
12
13

___________________________________
HON. SUSAN ILLSTON
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Proposed Order Dismissing Defendant Watchguard With Prejudice
Case No. No. 3:09-CV-00602-Si

-1-