Carrico et al v. City and County of San Francisco

Filing 64

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION. Signed by Judge Alsup on October 4, 2011. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 TIM CARRICO, SMALL PROPERTY OWNERS OF SAN FRANCISCO INSTITUTE, and MARY FIGONE, 12 Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 16 No. C 09-00605 WHA ORDER DISMISSING ACTION v. CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendants. / 17 18 On September 6, 2011, our court of appeals entered an opinion holding that 19 plaintiff-appellants’ allegations were insufficient to confer standing and that amendment would 20 be futile. The action was remanded with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction 21 (Dkt. No. 61). The mandate returning this action to the district court has just been entered 22 (Dkt. No. 62). The action is accordingly DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk SHALL 23 CLOSE THE FILE. 24 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 27 28 Dated: October 4, 2011. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?