Jones v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 19

ORDER re 14 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Anthony Jones, Nathaniel P. Ford, Sr terminated.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 5/21/09. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/22/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Russell A. Robinson, 163937 Law Office of Russell A. Robinson, APC 536 Magnolia Avenue, Ground Floor Piedmont CA 94611 Telephone: 415.255.0462 Facsimile: 510.655.0464 e-mail: rarcases@yahoo.com Counsel for Plaintiff ANTHONY JONES UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANTHONY JONES, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) ) MTA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/CEO ) NATHANIEL P. FORD, SR., ANTONIO ) PARRA, and DOES 1-100, ) Defendants. ) ) No. C-09-0611-CRB NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT NATHANIEL P. FORD IN HIS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, ONLY, WITHOUT PREJUDICE; ORDER [Civil Rights ­ Public Employment] TO THE COURT HEREIN AND TO ALL PARTIES AND COUNSEL OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff Anthony Jones hereby dismisses, without prejudice, Defendant NATHANIEL P. FORD in his individual capacity, only, pursuant to agreement of the parties through counsel of record. Date: May 19, 2009 /s/ Russell A. Robinson By: Russell A. Robinson Law Office of Russell A. Robinson, APC Attorneys for Plaintiff ANTHONY JONES 1 2 3 4 5 6 ORDER Based on the above, it is hereby ordered as follows: Defendant NATHANIEL P. FORD is hereby dismissed, in his individual capacity, without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. S 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Date: May 21, 2009 S DISTRICT TE C TA UNIT ED ER N F D IS T IC T O R -2- A C LI FO harles Judge C R. Brey er R NIA OO IT IS S Honorable Charles R. Breyer USDC, N.Dist. Of ED California RT U O RDER NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?