Jones v. City and County of San Francisco et al

Filing 35

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 2/16/2010. (be, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/16/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Russell A. Robinson, 163937 Law Office of Russell A. Robinson 345 Grove Street, First Floor San Francisco CA 94102 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: 431.4526 e-mail: [e-mail] Counsel for Plaintiff ANTHONY JONES

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ANTHONY JONES, ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) ) MTA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/CEO ) NATHANIEL P. FORD, SR., ANTONIO ) PARRA, and DOES 1-100, ) Defendants. ) ) TO THE COURT HEREIN: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff and Defendants, through counsel of record, hereby stipulate to dismissal of this action with prejudice in its entirety. No. C-09-0611-CRB

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION; ORDER [Civil Rights ­ Public Employment]

Date: February 11, 2010

/s/ Russell A. Robinson By: Russell A. Robinson Law Office of Russell A. Robinson Counsel for Plaintiff ANTHONY JONES /s/ LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH By: LAWRENCE HECIMOVICH Office of the City Attorney City & County of San Francisco Counsel for Defendants CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, MTA EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/CEO NATHANIEL P. FORD, SR., ANTONIO PARRA,

Date: February 11, 2010

1 2 3 4 5 6

ORDER Based on the above, it is hereby ordered as follows: This action is hereby dismissed, in its entirety, with prejudice. In conjunction with this dismissal, Defendants __are / __ are not entitled to recover their costs, if any. X IT IS SO ORDERED.

8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

UNIT ED

7

Date:

Feb. 16 , 2010

Honorable Charles R. Breyer USDC, N.Dist. OfRDERED O California

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

RT U O

ER

N

F D IS T IC T O R

-2-

A

C

LI

FO

J

arles R udge Ch

. Breyer

R NIA

O IT IS S

NO

RT

H