United States of America et al v. Ashby
Filing
22
ORDER RE CONTINUANCE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE CONTEMPT. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 6, 2009. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/6/2009)
Case3:09-cv-00631-WHA Document21
Filed11/06/09 Page1 of 1
1 J O S E P H P. RUSSONIELLO (CSBN 44332) U n ite d States Attorney 2 T H O M A S MOORE (ASBN 4305-O78T) A s s is ta n t United States Attorney 3 C h ie f , Tax Division 9th Floor Federal Building 4 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, California 94102 5 Telephone: (415) 436-7017 Attorneys for the United States of America 6 U N IT E D STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 S A N FRANCISCO DIVISION 9 U N IT E D STATES OF AMERICA et al., ) ) N O . CV-09-00631 WHA 10 ) P e titio n e r s, ) 11 ) A P P L IC A T IO N TO CONTINUE v. ) O R D E R TO SHOW CAUSE RE: 12 ) CONTEMPT AND ) [ P R O P O S E D ] ORDER THEREON 13 R O L A N D ASHBY, ) ) 14 Respondent. ) ) 15 16 R e sp o n d e n t Roland Ashby recently suffered a serious medical problem which
17 n e c es s ita te s he be allowed a reasonable period of time to recover his health without the 18 a d d itio n a l stress of an appearance at a Court hearing. Accordingly, the United States 19 re q u e sts that the Order To Show Cause Re: Contempt Hearing scheduled for November 20 1 2 , 2009, be continued to February 18, 2010 at 11:00 a.m., before United States District
th 21 C o u rt Judge William Alsup, Courtroom No. 9, 19 Floor, United States Courthouse, 450
22 G o ld e n Gate Avenue, San Francisco, California. 23 24 25 26 27
UNIT ED
JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO United States Attorney /s / THOMAS MOORE THOMAS MOORE A s s is ta n t United States Attorney C h ie f , Tax Division A t to r n e ys for Petitioners
S DISTRICT TE C TA
28 PURSUANT TO APPLICATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. D a ted : November 6, 2009
RT U O
S
ER
N
F D IS T IC T O R
A
C
LI
FO
su lliam Al UNITED STATES iDISTRICT JUDGE Judge W
p
R NIA
O IT IS S
E ORDER
D
NO
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?