Rand v. American National Insurance Company
ORDER setting 5/14/10 motion hearing (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/12/2010)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
WATERS KRAUS & PAUL LLP INGRID M. EVANS (179094) firstname.lastname@example.org SUNDEEP PATEL spatel@waterskraus (242284) 711 Van Ness Avenue, Suite 220 San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: 415-296-6060 BONNETT FAIRBOURN FRIEDMAN & BALINT, PC ANDREW S. FRIEDMAN (Pro Hac Vice) email@example.com KIMBERLY C. PAGE (Pro Hac Vice) firstname.lastname@example.org 2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 1000 Phoenix, AZ 85012 Telephone: 602-274-1100 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
WATERS KRAUS & PAUL LLP CHARLES S. SIEGEL (Pro Hac Vice) email@example.com 3219 McKinney Avenue Dallas, TX 75204 Telephone: 214-357-6244
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION Case No. CV 09-0639-SI CLASS ACTION
) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE ) COMPANY, a Texas corporation, ) ) Defendant. ______________________________________ ) DAPHNE P. RAND, by and through DEBRA L. DOLCHE, as Conservator of the Person and Estate of DAPHNE P. RAND, Conservatee, on Behalf of Themselves and All Others Similarly Situated,
JOINT STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING AND HEARING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
WHEREAS, on February 26, 2010, Defendant American National Insurance Company ("ANICO") filed a Motion for Partial Summary Judgment ("Motion").
-1Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Briefing and Hearing Schedule
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 // // //
WHEREAS, in order to adequately respond to ANICO's Motion, Plaintiff needs ANICO to produce certain documents responsive to its discovery requests and to take a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of ANICO on topics relating to compliance with Cal. Ins. Code § 10127 et seq., which the parties have agreed will take place on or before April 16, 2010. ANICO has also agreed to produce documents relevant to this Rule 30(b)(6) deposition prior to the deposition date. WHEREAS, Plaintiff anticipates that it can file its opposition to ANICO's Motion within ten (10) days of the completion of the aforementioned Rule 30(b)(6) deposition and ANICO anticipates that it can file its reply in support of its Motion within seven (7) days of the filing of Plaintiff's opposition. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and among the Parties, through their undersigned counsel, that, with the Court's permission, the following discovery, briefing and hearing schedule for ANICO's Motion shall be adopted: ANICO's Production of policy documents establishing the contents of the policy packets delivered to plaintiff and class members (e.g. Policy, application, cover, jacket, stickers, etc), compiled in the same format and order as these materials are delivered at the time of the sale to plaintiff and class members: Deposition of ANICO's Rule 30(b)(6) representative relating to compliance with Cal. Ins. Code § 10127, et seq.: Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment: Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion For Partial Summary Judgment: Hearing on ANICO's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment:
March 25, 2010
On or before April 16, 2010
April 26, 2010
May 3, 2010
14 May__, 2010
-2Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Briefing and Hearing Schedule
1 2 3 4 5 6
DATED: March 9, 2010
BONNETT, FAIRBOURN, FRIEDMAN & BALINT P.C.
/s/ ANDREW S. FRIEDMAN Attorneys for Plaintiff DAPHNE P. RAND, by and through DEBRA J. DOLCH, as Conservator of the Person and Estate of DAPHNE P. RAND, Conservatee
DATED: March 9, 2010 7 8
WILSON ELSER MOSKOWITZ EDELMAN & DICKER
By: 9 10 11
/s/ THOMAS M. HERILHY Attorneys for Defendant AMERICAN NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
ATTESTATION OF SIGNATURE 12 (N.D. Cal. General Order 45) 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -3Joint Stipulation and Proposed Order Regarding Briefing and Hearing Schedule IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: ____________________ By The Honorable Susan Illston District Court Judge ORDER By: /s/ INGRID M. EVANS DATED: March 9, 2010 WATERS KRAUS & PAUL Pursuant to General Order No. 45, § X(B), I hereby attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from all the signatories.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?