Placido v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/20/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 LORRAINE PLACIDO, Plaintiff, v. THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA; NORTEL NETWORKS LONG TERM DISABILITY PLAN, Defendants. / ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S SUGGESTION OF BANKRUPTCY No. C 09-00668 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The Court is in receipt of defendant's suggestion of bankruptcy and applicability of the automatic stay under 11 U.S.C. 362. Defendant indicates that Nortel Networks Inc. and several affiliated entities have filed a petition for bankruptcy. Both sides should respond by the dates set forth below and address the extent to which the automatic stay provision applies to each of the defendants named in this action. If the stay provision does not apply to all defendants, the filings should provide any reasons why this case should not proceed as to any defendant not governed by the stay. All parties should submit a brief addressing these issues (limited to five pages), by MARCH 27, 2009. Defendants may respond jointly or separately. The parties may, if they wish, file a response thereto (limited to three pages), by APRIL 1, 2009.
Dated: March 20, 2009.
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?