Ross et al v. Trex Company, Inc.
Filing
233
ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED 232 STIPULATION Continuing Case Management Conference. Case Management Statement due by 12/28/2012. Case Management Conference set for 1/4/2013 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco.. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/5/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/5/2012)
Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document232 Filed11/02/12 Page1 of 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300
Seattle, WA 98101
Telephone: 206.623.7292
Facsimile: 206.623.0594
K&L GATES LLP
Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200
San Francisco, CA 94111-5994
Telephone: 415.882.8200
Facsimile: 415.822-8220
Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice)
steve@hbsslaw.com
Tyler S. Weaver (pro hac vice)
tyler@hbsslaw.com
Robert F. Lopez (pro hac vice)
robl@hbsslaw.com
Patrick J. Perrone (pro hac vice)
patrick.perrone@klgates.com
Todd L. Nunn (pro hac vice)
todd.nunn@klgates.com
Attorneys for Defendant Trex Company, Inc.
7
8
Attorneys for Select Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel
for the Proposed Class
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12
13
14
15
16
DEAN MAHAN, GRETCHEN SILVERMAN,
STEVEN MCKENNA, THOMAS
SCHAUPPNER, MARJORIE ZACHWIEJA,
JOHN FORCELLA, SHEILA SHAPIRO,
SABRINA W. HASS and DR. LANNY W.
HASS, AMY BIONDI-HUFFMAN, and BRIAN
HATHAWAY, on behalf of themselves and all
others similarly situated,
Case No. CV 09-00670-JSW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
17
Plaintiffs,
18
vs.
19
20
21
TREX COMPANY, INC., a Delaware
corporation,
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. CV 09-00670-JSW
Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document232 Filed11/02/12 Page2 of 3
1
Per the Civil Standing Orders of the Honorable Jeffrey S. White, plaintiffs and defendant Trex
2
Company, Inc. (“Trex”), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate and respectfully
3
ask the Court to continue the due-date for their Case Management Statement, presently due on
4
November 2, 2012, and to continue the Case Management Conference, which presently is scheduled
5
for November 9, 2012. See September 4, 2012 Order Granting as Modified Stipulation To Continue
6
Case Management Conference (Dkt. No. 231).
7
The parties now are close to settling this matter. They expect to be able to report to the Court
8
within two weeks on whether they have reached a settlement, and if so, to propose a schedule for a
9
motion for preliminary approval of their settlement. Accordingly, and in light of the Court’s
10
available dates on its schedule for a case management conference, the parties ask that the Court
11
continue the due date for their Case Management Statement to November 30, 2012, and that the
12
Court continue their Case Management Conference to December 7, 2012.
13
14
DATED: November 2, 2012.
HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP
15
By
16
17
18
/s/ Robert F. Lopez
Steve W. Berman
Tyler S. Weaver
Robert F. Lopez
Attorneys for Select Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel
for the Proposed Class
19
20
21
DATED: November 2, 2012.
K&L GATES LLP
22
23
By:
24
25
/s/ Patrick J. Perrone
Patrick J. Perrone
Todd L. Nunn
Attorneys for Defendant Trex Company, Inc.
26
27
28
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. CV 09-00670-JSW
Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document232 Filed11/02/12 Page3 of 3
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
The foregoing Stipulation having been reviewed, and good cause appearing therefor, the
2
3
requested scheduling change is hereby ORDERED and approved.
the case management conference is CONTINUED to January 4, 2013.
4
5
6
Dated:
November 5, 2012
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING
CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
Case No. CV 09-00670-JSW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?