Ross et al v. Trex Company, Inc.

Filing 256

ORDER GRANTING 255 STIPULATION regarding Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement and Page Limit. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 3/18/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/18/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document255 Filed03/13/13 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: 206.623.7292 Facsimile: 206.623.0594 K&L GATES LLP Four Embarcadero Center, Suite 1200 San Francisco, CA 94111-5994 Telephone: 415.882.8200 Facsimile: 415.822-8220 Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice) steve@hbsslaw.com Tyler S. Weaver (pro hac vice) tyler@hbsslaw.com Robert F. Lopez (pro hac vice) robl@hbsslaw.com Patrick J. Perrone (pro hac vice) patrick.perrone@klgates.com Todd L. Nunn (pro hac vice) todd.nunn@klgates.com Attorneys for Defendant Trex Company, Inc. 7 8 Attorneys for Select Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel for the Proposed Class 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 DEAN MAHAN, GRETCHEN SILVERMAN, STEVEN MCKENNA, THOMAS SCHAUPPNER, MARJORIE ZACHWIEJA, JOHN FORCELLA, SHEILA SHAPIRO, SABRINA W. HASS and DR. LANNY W. HASS, AMY BIONDI-HUFFMAN, and BRIAN HATHAWAY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Case No. CV 09-00670-JSW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT AND PAGE LIMIT 17 Plaintiffs, 18 vs. 19 20 21 TREX COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation, Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT, ETC. Case No. CV 09-00670-JSW Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document255 Filed03/13/13 Page2 of 3 1 As the parties have advised, they have reached agreement on most terms of settlement of this 2 matter on a proposed nationwide basis. With respect to the remaining few issues, the parties continue 3 to work with plaintiffs’ expert consultant and defendant’s technical representatives, and otherwise 4 with their mediator, to conclude these matters fully. Accordingly, the parties require a short 5 extension of the current briefing schedule in order to resolve the remaining issues and to conclude the 6 settlement documentation and briefing accordingly. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 In light of the foregoing, the parties now stipulate to, and ask respectfully that the Court approve, the following revised schedule for a motion for preliminary approval of their settlement: Motion for preliminary approval due: April 5, 2013; Any opposition to the motion for preliminary approval due: No later than 14 days following the filing of the motion for preliminary approval, per Local Civil Rule 7-3(a); Any reply to any opposition filed in response to the motion for preliminary approval due: No later than seven (7) days following the filing of any opposition, per Local Civil Rule 7-3(c). Hearing on the motion for preliminary approval: May 10, 2013 at 9 a.m., or as otherwise set by the Court. 16 So that they may apprise the Court fully of all pertinent matters in the motion for preliminary 17 approval, the parties also stipulate and ask that the page limit be increased from 15 pages to 25 pages 18 for that motion. 19 DATED: March 14, 2013 HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP By 20 21 22 /s/ Robert F. Lopez Steve W. Berman Tyler S. Weaver Robert F. Lopez Attorneys for Select Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel for the Proposed Class 23 24 25 DATED: March 14, 2013 K&L GATES LLP By: 26 27 28 /s/ Patrick J. Perrone Patrick J. Perrone Todd L. Nunn Attorneys for Defendant Trex Company, Inc. 1 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT, ETC. Case No. CV 09-00670-JSW Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document255 Filed03/13/13 Page3 of 3 [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 2 The foregoing Stipulation having been reviewed, and good cause appearing therefor, the 3 requested revised schedule regarding the motion for preliminary approval of settlement is hereby 4 5 ORDERED and approved. The parties shall notice the motion to be heard on an open date at least 35 days out. In addition, the Court grants the parties’ stipulated request for a 25-page limit for the motion 6 for preliminary approval of settlement. 7 8 9 Dated: March 18, 2013 Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF SETTLEMENT, ETC. Case No. CV 09-00670-JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?