Ross et al v. Trex Company, Inc.

Filing 297

ORDER GRANTING AS MODIFIED Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, Provisionally Certifying Settlement Class, Appointing Class Representatives and Class Counsel, and Setting Deadlines and Final Fairness Hearing. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 8/27/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/27/2013)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document296 Filed08/26/13 Page1 of 12 1 2 3 4 5 Steve W. Berman (pro hac vice) Robert F. Lopez (pro hac vice) HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1918 Eighth Avenue, Suite 3300 Seattle, WA 98101 Telephone: (206) 623-7292 Facsimile: (206) 623-0594 Counsel for Select Plaintiffs and Lead Counsel for the Proposed Class 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 12 13 DEAN MAHAN, GRETCHEN SILVERMAN, STEVEN MCKENNA, THOMAS SCHAUPPNER, MARJORIE ZACHWIEJA, JOHN FORCELLA, SHEILA SHAPIRO, SABRINA W. HASS and DR. LANNY W. HASS, AMY BIONDI-HUFFMAN, and BRIAN HATHAWAY, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 14 15 16 v. TREX COMPANY, INC., a Delaware corporation, No. CV 09-00670-JSW AMENDED [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT, PROVISIONALLY CERTIFYING SETTLEMENT CLASS, APPOINTING CLASS REPRESENTATIVES AND CLASS COUNSEL, AND SETTING DEADLINES AND SETTING FINAL FAIRNESS HEARING, AS MODIFIED HEREIN 17 Defendant. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER 010095-13 635308 V1 Case No.: CV 09-00670-JSW Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document296 Filed08/26/13 Page2 of 12 1 This Court has before it plaintiffs’ Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Approval 2 of Class Action Settlement, Provisional Certification of Settlement Class, and Appointment of 3 Class Representatives and Class Counsel (“Motion”) (Dkt. No. 258), as well as the supporting 4 declarations of Robert F. Lopez with exhibits (Dkt No. 259), Adrian Garcia (Dkt. No. 260), and 5 Anatole A. Klyosov, Ph.D. (Dkt. No. 261). In addition and in further support of the Motion, the 6 Court has before it defendant Trex Company, Inc.’s (“Trex”) Administrative Motion To File Under 7 Seal and the declaration of Patrick J. Perrone sought to be filed under seal (Dkt. No. 257); 8 plaintiffs’ reply memorandum in support of their Motion (Dkt. No. 271) and the Declaration of 9 Robert F. Lopez in further support of the Motion, with exhibit (Dkt. No. 272); the Declaration of 10 Anatole A. Klyosov, Ph.D. in further support of the Motion (Dkt. No. 273); the Administrative 11 Motion To File Under Seal, and the declaration of Robert F. Lopez sought to be filed under seal 12 (Dkt. No. 274); the Declaration of Patrick J. Perrone in Support of the Motion, with exhibits (Dkt. 13 No. 275); the parties’ memorandum in response to the Court’s order of May 28, 2013 (Dkt. Nos. 14 276 and 279); the Declaration of William R. Gupp in support of the Motion (Dkt. No. 280); the 15 parties’ joint motion to file memoranda in response to the second memorandum of Caryn Borger, 16 M.D. (Dkt. No. 283); Trex’s memorandum in response to the second memorandum of Caryn 17 Borger, M.D., with the declarations of Patrick J. Perrone (with exhibits) and Alan Vasquez (Dkt. 18 No. 284); plaintiffs’ memorandum in response to the second memorandum of Caryn Borger, M.D. 19 (Dkt. Nos. 285 and 286); the declaration of Patrick J. Perrone in further support of the Motion, with 20 exhibit (Dkt. No. 287), and the pleadings and papers on file in this matter. Having reviewed the 21 Motion and the foregoing pleadings, and having determined that oral argument would not aid the 22 Court in disposing of the instant motion, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows: 23 1. Unless otherwise indicated, all defined terms used in this Order shall have the same 24 meaning as described in the parties’ Stipulation of Settlement and Release (“Settlement 25 Agreement”) originally dated April 5, 2013 and revised and filed on July 31, 2013 (Dkt. Nos. 287- 26 1 and 287-2) and incorporated by this reference. The Settlement referenced therein shall be 27 referred to herein as “the Settlement.” 28 AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER - 1 010095-13 635308 V1 Case No.: CV 09-00670-JSW Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document296 Filed08/26/13 Page3 of 12 1 2. This case is preliminarily certified as a class action for settlement purposes pursuant 2 to Rule 23(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. In this regard, the Court directs that the 3 Settlement Class shall include: 4 All Persons in the United States or its territories who own or owned a Trex Structure built with Trex Product purchased during the Class Period. Included within the Settlement class are the legal representatives, heirs, successors in interest, transferees, and assignees of all such foregoing holders and/or owners, immediate and remote. 5 6 7 The Class Period is defined as August 1, 2004 through the date of entry of this order. 8 3. Excluded from the Settlement Class are: (1) Trex and its subsidiaries and affiliates; 9 (2) all Persons who, in accordance with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, properly execute 10 and timely file by the Opt-Out Deadline (defined in paragraph 20 below) a request for exclusion 11 from the Settlement Class; (3) all governmental entities; and (4) the judge(s) to whom this case is 12 13 assigned and any immediate family members thereof. At this stage of the proceedings, 4. The Court notes, and overrules, the objections of Caryn Borger, M.D., to 14 preliminary approval of the Settlement. The Court notes that two other individuals, Ellen Kopetsky 15 and Richard Levin, both represented by the same counsel, also objected to preliminary approval of 16 the Settlement but then withdrew their objections. (Dkt. Nos. 267 and 291.) For the reasons stated 17 elsewhere in this order, the Court finds the Settlement worthy of preliminary approval and finds it 18 appropriate that notice of the Settlement should issue to the Settlement Class as stated herein. 19 5. Plaintiffs allege that the defendant has violated federal, state, and common law by 20 misrepresenting or concealing the characteristics of certain Trex wood-plastic composite decking, 21 railing, and fencing (“Trex Product”) by breaching warranties and/or by defrauding consumers, or 22 treating consumers unfairly, in the design, manufacturing, and marketing and sale of Trex Product. 23 Trex denies that plaintiffs’ claims have merit. 24 6. The parties have entered into the Settlement Agreement to resolve these claims and 25 to avoid the expense and uncertainties associated with continued litigation. 26 7. The Court previously has appointed Hagens Berman Sobol Shapiro LLP (“Hagens 27 Berman”) to serve as lead counsel in this matter. The Court appoints Dean Mahan, Gretchen 28 AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER - 2 010095-13 635308 V1 Case No.: CV 09-00670-JSW Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document296 Filed08/26/13 Page4 of 12 1 Silverman, Steven McKenna, Thomas Schauppner, Marjorie Zachwieja, John Forcella, Sheila 2 Shapiro, Sabrina W. Hass and Dr. Lanny W. Hass, Amy Biondi-Huffman, and Brian Hathaway to 3 serve as Class Representatives. It further appoints Hagens Berman to serve as Class Counsel. 4 8. For purposes of the settlement of this action (and only for such purposes, 5 and without an adjudication on the merits), the Court preliminarily makes the following findings 6 under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the United States Constitution, and the Rules of this 7 Court: 8 (a) 9 that the Class consists of thousands of persons who own decks constructed 10 11 For purposes of the settlement of this action, the Court preliminarily finds with the Trex Product in question. (b) For purposes of the settlement of this action, the Court preliminarily finds 12 that there exists at least one question of fact and law purportedly common to 13 the Class in that they complain of alleged misrepresentations by Trex and 14 the alleged condition of Trex Product. 15 (c) For purposes of the settlement of this action, the Court preliminarily 16 finds that the claims of the named Plaintiffs are typical of the claims 17 of the Class that are being settled. 18 (d) For purposes of the settlement of this action, the Court preliminarily finds 19 that Plaintiffs and Class Counsel will fairly and adequately protect the 20 interests of the Class. 21 (e) For purposes of the settlement of this action, the Court preliminarily finds 22 that a resolution of this action in the manner proposed by the Settlement 23 Agreement is superior to other available methods for a fair and efficient 24 adjudication of the action and that common issues predominate over 25 individual issues. The proposed resolution of this action involves a Claim 26 Resolution Process which will identify and resolve complaints without 27 burdening the courts or regulators and which will result in a cash award to 28 qualified claimants; or, in the alternative, to qualified claimants, a 40% AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER - 3 010095-13 635308 V1 Case No.: CV 09-00670-JSW Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document296 Filed08/26/13 Page5 of 12 1 rebate of the retail purchase price of a different Trex product designed to 2 resist mold and mildew and color fading issues, as well as Trex-brand 3 fasteners, if used previously; or, in the alternative, to qualified claimants, a 4 50% rebate of the retail purchase price of a different Trex product designed 5 to resist mold and mildew and color fading issues, plus a partial payment for 6 labor costs; or, in the alternative, to qualified claimants, a 20% partial cash 7 refund on the claimant’s Trex Product and Trex-brand fasteners, if used 8 previously, all as set forth in greater detail in the Settlement Agreement 9 (Dkt. No. 287). The Court also notes that, because this action is being 10 settled rather than litigated, the Court need not consider manageability 11 issues that might be presented by the trial of a nationwide class action 12 involving the issues in this case. See Amchem Prods., Inc. v. Windsor, 521 13 U.S. 591, 117 S. Ct. 2231, 138 L. Ed. 2d 689 (1997). 14 9. In making these findings, the Court has considered, among other factors: (i) the 15 interests of Class Members in individually controlling the prosecution or defense of separate 16 actions; (ii) the impracticability or inefficiency of prosecuting or defending separate actions; (iii) 17 the extent and nature of any litigation concerning these claims already commenced; and (iv) the 18 desirability of concentrating the litigation of the claims in a particular forum. The Court takes 19 guidance in its consideration of certification issues from Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp., 150 F.3d 1011 20 (9th Cir. 1998). 21 10. The proposed Settlement was the product of arms’-length negotiation, including two 22 in-person mediations before the Hon. Wayne R. Andersen (U.S.D.J. N.D. Ill. Ret.) and several 23 follow-up telephone and email conversations with Judge Andersen, and it was reached in good 24 faith. It provides meaningful relief to the Class, including alternatives among cash, partial cash 25 refunds and reimbursements, and cash-rebate relief as set forth in the Settlement Agreement (Dkt. 26 Nos. 287-1 and 287-2). The proposed Settlement is sufficiently fair, reasonable, and adequate to 27 warrant the distribution of a notice to the Class regarding the Settlement Agreement. Accordingly, 28 Trex shall cause class notice to be distributed as established by the Class Notice Plan attached as AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER - 4 010095-13 635308 V1 Case No.: CV 09-00670-JSW Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document296 Filed08/26/13 Page6 of 12 1 Exhibit G to the Settlement Agreement (Dkt. No. 287-2) and as explained further in the 2 Declaration of Alan Vasquez (Dkt. No. 284). 3 11. The Class Notice Plan (“Notice Plan”) shall include: (1) direct mail notice to all 4 Settlement Class Members where a U.S. mail (first choice) or email (second choice, if no U.S. mail 5 address is known) address is known to Trex’s counsel for any reason, including via GE Capital or 6 TrexPRO contractors, or via Plaintiffs’ counsel in this matter; (2) national print publication notice; 7 (3) Internet/web notice via banner advertising and sponsored links, including on Facebook; (4) 8 notice on Trex’s website and a Settlement Website; (5) notice in writing from Trex to its 9 distributors, retailers, and independent TrexPRO contractors of the settlement, and (6) a national 10 press release, all as specified in greater detail below and in the Notice Plan attached as Exhibit G to 11 the Settlement Agreement (Dkt. No. 287-2) and as explained further in the Declaration of Alan 12 Vasquez (Dkt. No. 284). 13 12. Class Notice by Direct Mail/Email: Within 14 days of entry of this order, Trex shall 14 mail by first-class U.S. mail, postage prepaid (where physical address is available), or e-mail 15 (where no physical address is available but an e-mail address is available), a copy of the Long- 16 Form Class Notice (attached to the Notice Plan (Dkt. No. 287-2)) to all of those Class Members 17 who have complained of mold, mildew, fungal, or other dark or gray growth/spotting, or any color 18 variation or color fading, to Trex or counsel for any Plaintiffs in this matter, to all those Class 19 Members whose identities are otherwise known to Trex, and to all those Class Members who have 20 contacted counsel for Plaintiffs in this matter for any reason pertaining to Trex’s decking products 21 and for whom counsel have U.S. mail or e-mail addresses (the “Class Notice by Regular Mail or E- 22 Mail”). Before mailing out the Long-Form Class Notice by Regular Mail, Trex shall run the 23 addresses through the national change-of-address database in an effort to identify the most current 24 addresses. The Class Notice by Regular Mail or E-Mail shall also include a copy of the Claim 25 Form and the Supplemental Claim Form (attached as Exhibits A and C to the Settlement 26 Agreement (Dkt. No. 287-1)). Trex shall re-mail an additional Class Notice by Regular Mail or E- 27 Mail to potential Class Members whose original class notice regular mailings were returned to Trex 28 prior to the Settlement Final Approval Date (i.e., the date on which the Court, if it so decides, AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER - 5 010095-13 635308 V1 Case No.: CV 09-00670-JSW Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document296 Filed08/26/13 Page7 of 12 1 grants final approval to the Settlement) as undelivered with a forwarding address. Trex shall not be 2 required to re-mail any notices returned without a forwarding address or that are returned after the 3 Settlement Final Approval Date. Trex also shall not be required to re-send any e-mail notices for 4 which Trex receives notice that the e-mails were undeliverable unless Class Counsel or the Class 5 Member provides Trex with a different e-mail address prior to the Settlement Final Approval Date. 6 Additionally, Trex shall provide written notice of the Settlement by mail to all current TrexPRO 7 contractors, which notice will include a request that the TrexPRO contractors forward such notice 8 to any customers for whom the TrexPRO contractor built a deck using Trex Product during the 9 Class Period. Trex shall provide ample copies of the notice (postage prepaid) to those TrexPRO 10 contractors who request them. Trex shall also forward notice of the Settlement to the TrexPRO’s 11 customers if the TrexPRO contractor provides the customers’ names and addresses to Trex. Trex 12 shall also provide written notice of the Settlement by mail to GE Capital. Gilardi & Co., LLP 13 (“Gilardi”) shall mail notice to those Class Members who used GE Capital to finance their 14 purchase of their Trex Product during the Class period. 15 13. Print Publication Notice: At the earliest available publication date for each 16 periodical, Trex shall publish notice of the proposed Settlement, the Fairness Hearing, and Class 17 Members’ objection and appeal rights in USA Today, National Edition, black and white, 1/6 page 18 insertion, Professional Deck Builder magazine, black and white, half page, Sunset Magazine, black 19 and white, one-third page, This Old House magazine, black and white, one-third page, Residential 20 Building Products News magazine, black and white, half page, and Replacement Contractor 21 magazine, black and white, half page (the “Publication Notice”). The Publication Notice shall be 22 in a form substantially similar to Exhibit D attached to the Notice Plan (the “Short-Form Class 23 Notice”) (Dkt. 287-2). 24 14. Internet/Web Notice: Within 14 days of entry this order, Trex shall publish a copy 25 of the Long-Form Class Notice, the Short-Form Class Notice, the Request for Claim Form, and the 26 Request for Supplemental Claim Form (attached to the Notice Plan as Exhibits A through D (Dkt. 27 No. 287-2)), the Claim Form, and the Supplemental Claim Form (attached, respectively, as 28 Exhibits A and C to the Stipulation of Settlement and Release (Dkt. No. 287-1)), via Trex’s regular AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER - 6 010095-13 635308 V1 Case No.: CV 09-00670-JSW Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document296 Filed08/26/13 Page8 of 12 1 website and a Settlement Website (which shall be established within 14 days of entry of this order 2 at Trex’s expense). Also within 14 days of entry of this order, Trex shall commence providing 3 notice via (a) sponsored links for searches covering the keywords “Trex” or “composite decking” 4 paired with any of the following keywords: “mold,” “mildew,” “fungal growth,” “fungal spotting,” 5 “color variation,” or “color fading” on Google, Yahoo, Bing, and AOL, at an aggregate cost of 6 $10,000, which sponsored links will be devised by, purchased by, and spread among the sites for 7 maximum reach by Gilardi; and (b) website banner advertisements placed on the following 8 websites: bobvila.com, deckcreations.com, gardenstructure.com, and gardenweb.com at an 9 aggregate cost of $10,000, which advertisements will be composed by, purchased by, and spread 10 among the sites for maximum reach by Gilardi; (c) Google Display Network text link ads for 11 searches covering the keywords “Trex” or “composite decking” paired with any of the following 12 keywords: “mold,” “fungal growth,” “fungal spotting,” “color variation,” or “color fading” at an 13 aggregate cost of $25,000, which text link ads will be devised by, purchased by, and spread among 14 the sites for maximum reach by Gilardi; and (d) Facebook text link ads at an aggregate cost of 15 $5,000, which text link ads will be devised by and purchased by Gilardi. 16 15. In addition, within 14 days of entry of this order, Trex shall formally advise all of its 17 distributors and retailers of the Settlement in writing, such that retailers will be able to direct 18 consumers to the Settlement Website and to advise them as to how to obtain Claim Forms and 19 Supplemental Claim Forms. 20 16. Also, within 7 days of entry of this order, Gilardi shall issue a press release 21 regarding the Settlement through either Businesswire or PR Newswire, which press release shall be 22 jointly approved by Trex and the plaintiffs. 23 17. Additionally, Spanish-language versions of the Long-Form Class Notice, the Short- 24 Form Class Notice, the Request for Claim Form, the Request for Supplemental Claim Form, the 25 Claim Form, and the Supplemental Claim Form will be available. The Long-Form Class Notice 26 and Short-Form Class Notice will direct Class Members to the websites where the aforementioned 27 Spanish-language documents can be obtained. 28 AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER - 7 010095-13 635308 V1 Case No.: CV 09-00670-JSW Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document296 Filed08/26/13 Page9 of 12 1 At this stage, the Court concludes that 18. Distribution of the Class Notice as described herein is reasonable and the best 2 practicable notice under the circumstances; is reasonably calculated to apprise Class Members of 3 the pendency of the action and of their right to object to and opt-out of the proposed settlement; 4 constitutes due, adequate, and sufficient notice to all persons entitled to receive notice; and meets 5 the requirements of due process, the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and the United States 6 Constitution. 7 8 9 19. Trex shall file proof by affidavit of the mailing of the Class Notice by Direct Mail and publication of the Publication Notice at least 35 days before date of the Fairness Hearing. 20. Each Class Member who wishes to exclude himself or herself from the Class must 10 submit to Counsel for Defendant a written request for exclusion postmarked no later than 45 days 11 from the last date that Notice is sent by Trex or first published as set forth in the Notice Plan (“Opt- 12 Out Deadline”). For the sake of clarity, the Opt-Out Deadline shall be published on the Settlement 13 Website as soon as it is established. Any Class Member who does not submit a timely, written 14 request for exclusion will be bound by all proceedings, orders, and judgment in this Action, which 15 will have preclusive effect in all pending or future lawsuits or other proceedings. 16 21. Any potential Class Member who objects to the Settlement Agreement may appear 17 at the Fairness hearing and show cause why such Settlement Agreement should not be approved as 18 fair, reasonable, and adequate and why the Final Order and Judgment should not be entered 19 thereon; provided that each such Class Member shall deliver to the offices of Class Counsel and 20 Trex’s counsel and file with the Court, not later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the Fairness 21 Hearing: the written Notice of Intent to Object, which more specifically must be: (a) filed with the 22 Clerk of the Court not later than twenty-one (21) days before the date set for the Fairness Hearing; 23 and (b) sent by first-class mail, postmarked not later than twenty-one (21) days before the date set 24 for the Fairness Hearing, to Class Counsel and Counsel for the Defendant. Any Notice of Intent to 25 Object must contain: (a) a heading which refers to the Action; (b) a statement as to whether the 26 objector intends to appear at the Fairness Hearing, either in person or through counsel, and, if 27 through counsel, identify counsel by name, address and phone number; (c) a detailed statement of 28 the specific legal and factual bases for each and every objection; (d) a list of any witnesses and AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER - 8 010095-13 635308 V1 Case No.: CV 09-00670-JSW Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document296 Filed08/26/13 Page10 of 12 1 photocopies of exhibits which the objector intends to introduce at the Fairness Hearing, if any; and 2 (e) the objector’s signature, verifying, under penalty of perjury, that he or she is a member of the 3 Settlement Class and the address of the relevant property. Any Class Member who fails to comply 4 with these requirements will be barred from objecting to this Settlement Agreement. 5 22. Any attorneys hired by individual Class Members for the purpose of objecting to the 6 proposed Settlement shall file with the Clerk of the Court and serve on Class Counsel and Trex’s 7 counsel a notice of appearance, no later than twenty-one (21) days prior to the Fairness Hearing. 8 9 23. Any filings, exclusions, objections and appearances shall be filed and/or served on counsel at the following addresses: 10 Clerk of the Court United States District Court Northern District of California – San Francisco Division 450 Golden Gate Avenue San Francisco, CA 94102 11 12 13 Class Counsel: 14 17 Steve W. Berman Robert F. Lopez HAGENS BERMAN SOBOL SHAPIRO LLP 1918 Eighth Ave., Ste. 3300 Seattle, WA 98101 18 Counsel for Defendant: 19 Patrick J. Perrone K&L GATES, LLP One Newark Center, 10th Fl. Newark, NJ 07102 15 16 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 24. Class Counsel and Trex’s counsel shall promptly furnish each other with copies of any objections, appearances, and requests for exclusion that come into their possession. 25. No person shall be entitled in any way to contest the approval of the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement or the Final Order and Judgment to be entered thereon except by filing and serving written objections in accordance with the provisions of the Settlement Agreement. Any Class Member who does not submit a timely, written objection or request for exclusion from the class in compliance with all of the procedures set forth in this Order and the AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER - 9 010095-13 635308 V1 Case No.: CV 09-00670-JSW Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document296 Filed08/26/13 Page11 of 12 1 Settlement Agreement will be deemed to have waived all such objections and will, therefore, be 2 bound by all proceedings, orders and judgments in this action, which will be preclusive in all 3 pending or future lawsuits or other proceedings. 4 26. All Class Members who have not been timely excluded from the Class are hereby 5 preliminarily enjoined from filing, commencing, prosecuting, maintaining, intervening in, 6 participating in (as class members or otherwise), or receiving any benefits from any other lawsuit, 7 arbitration, or administrative, regulatory or other proceeding in any jurisdiction based on or relating 8 to the claims and causes of action, or the facts and circumstances relating thereto, in this Action 9 and/or based on or relating to the Released Claims and Released Parties as defined in the 10 Settlement Agreement. In addition, all persons or entities are hereby preliminarily enjoined from 11 filing, commencing, prosecuting or maintaining any other lawsuit as a class action (including by 12 seeking to amend a pending complaint to include class allegations, or by seeking class certification 13 in a pending action in any jurisdiction) on behalf of Class Members who have not been timely 14 excluded from the Class, if such other class action is based on or relates to the claims and causes of 15 action, or the facts and circumstances relating thereto, in this Action and/or based on or relating to 16 the Released Claims and Released Parties as defined in the Settlement Agreement. The Court finds 17 that issuance of this preliminary injunction is necessary and appropriate in aid of the Court’s 18 jurisdiction over this action. The Court finds no bond is necessary for issuance of this injunction. 19 27. The Court will hold a Fairness Hearing to finally consider the fairness, 20 reasonableness, and adequacy of the proposed settlement and whether it should be approved by the 21 Court on December 13, 2013 at 9:00 o’clock a.m. in the courtroom of the Honorable Jeffrey S. 22 White of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San Francisco 23 Division. No later than thirty-five (35) days before the Fairness Hearing, Plaintiffs shall file a 24 Motion for Final Approval of the Settlement. Also, Class Counsel shall file with this Court their 25 motion for an award of attorneys’ fees, costs, reimbursement of expenses, and named Plaintiff 26 service awards no later than thirty-five (35) days before the Fairness Hearing. Class Members shall 27 file any comments in support of, or in objection to, final approval of the Settlement and/or the 28 motion for attorneys’ fees, costs, expenses, and Plaintiff service awards no later than twenty-one AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER - 10 010095-13 635308 V1 Case No.: CV 09-00670-JSW Case3:09-cv-00670-JSW Document296 Filed08/26/13 Page12 of 12 1 (21) days before the Fairness Hearing. On or before seven (7) days before the Fairness Hearing, 2 the Parties may file with the Court reply brief(s) responding to any filed objections. 3 28. The hearing date or time for the Fairness Hearing may be moved sua sponte by the 4 Court or pursuant to a stipulation by the parties subject to Court approval without providing 5 additional notice to the Class Members. 6 29. Class Members shall, upon final approval of the Settlement Agreement, be bound by 7 the terms and provisions of the Settlement Agreement so approved, including but not limited to the 8 releases, waivers, and covenants described in the agreement, whether or not such person or entity 9 objected to the Settlement Agreement and whether or not such person or entity makes a claim upon 10 11 12 the settlement funds. 30. All further proceedings in this litigation are hereby stayed except for any actions required to effectuate the Settlement Agreement. 13 14 DATED: August 27 ______________________, 2013. 15 16 Honorable Jeffrey S. White United States District Judge 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 AMENDED PROPOSED ORDER - 11 010095-13 635308 V1 Case No.: CV 09-00670-JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?