Battram v. Trojan Systems, Inc. et al
Filing
7
ORDER RE REQUEST TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/3/2009)
<![CDATA[
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ED BATTRAM, Plaintiff, v. TROJAN SYSTEMS, INC., a California corporation; THOMAS MARTIN, an individual, and DOES 1 through 10, inclusive, Defendants. / ORDER RE REQUEST TO CONTINUE DEADLINE FOR RESPONSIVE PLEADING No. C 09-00690 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
11
For the Northern District of California
12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
The Court is in receipt of the stipulation to continue the date for defendants to file a responsive pleading. The filing does not state the current deadline (and the length of the continuance) nor the reasons for the delay, and thus the Court is unable to assess the reasonableness of the continuance. The request is DENIED, without prejudice to a further filing explaining the delay requested and showing good cause therefor.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 3, 2009.
WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
]]>
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?
