Neo v. Marina Brothers, Inc. et al

Filing 141

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT SAIGON CITY INVESTMENT. Signed by Judge Alsup on November 18, 2009. (whalc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/18/2009)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 AIK CHEONG NEO, an individual d/b/a PO LO KU TRADING, and KAI CHANG HO, an individual, Plaintiffs, v. MARINA BROTHERS, INC., a California corporation d/b/a MARINA FOOD #5; WELCOME MARKET, INC., a California corporation d/b/a 99 RANCH MARKET; T. L. LONGCHAMP CORPORATION, a California corporation d/b/a LION FOOD CENTER; WING WA, INC., a California corporation d/b/a WING WA SUPERMARKET; NGU HANH SON INC. a California corporation d/b/a CHO SENTER MARKET; ROYAL CAPITAL GROUP, LLC. d/b/a NEW ASIA SUPERMARKET; LINCHANG Liu and YI-HUI LIU, individuals d/b/a EIGHT-WAY VEGE; HAWAII SUPERMARKET; MY THUAN, INC. , a California corporation d/b/a MY THUAN SUPERMARKET; DONG PHUONG INC, a California corporation d/b/a ABC SUPERMARKET; SAIGON CITY INVESTMENT, INC., a California corporation, D/b/a SAIGON CITY MARKETPLACE; CHUNG WORLD CORPORATION, a California corporation, d/b/a QUANG MINH SUPERMARKET; HOA BINH GARDEN GROVE SUPERMARKET, INC., a California corporation; KAM LEE YUEN TRADING CO., INC., a California corporation; SUNNY GOLD INC., a New York corporation; PO LO KU TRADING, INC., a New York corporation; and JOHN DOES 1-20, Defendants. / [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATED DISMISSAL OF DEFENDANT SAIGON CITY INVESTMENT, INC., a California corporation, d/b/a SAIGON CITY MARKETPLACE, WITH PREJUDICE, PURSUANT TO FED. R. CIV. P. 41(a)(1) WITH MODIFICATIONS No. C 09-00739 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Having considered Plaintiffs Aik Cheong Neo, an individual d/b/a Po Lo Ku Trading, and Kai Chang Ho, an individual, and Defendant Saigon City Investment, Inc., a California

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

corporation, d/b/a Saigon City Marketplace's Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice, Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1) ("Amended Stipulation of Dismissal"), and for good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that this Action, and associated cross-claims, is dismissed with prejudice as to Defendant Saigon City Investment, Inc., d/b/a Saigon City Marketplace. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court shall retain jurisdiction for three years from the date of this order over Plaintiffs Aik Cheong Neo, an individual d/b/a Po Lo Ku Trading and Kai Chang Ho, an individual, and Defendant Saigon City Investment, Inc., a California corporation, d/b/a Saigon City Marketplace to enforce the Agreement, and any such disputes arising under the Agreement shall be heard before a Magistrate Judge. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Aik Cheong Neo, an individual d/b/a Po Lo Ku Trading, and Kai Chang Ho, an individual, and Defendant Saigon City Investment, Inc., a California corporation, d/b/a Saigon City Marketplace bear their own attorneys' fees and costs.

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: November 18, 2009.

WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

2