Kline v. United Parcel Service Inc.

Filing 24

ORDER extending mediation deadline (tf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/8/2009)

Case3:09-cv-00742-SI Document23

Filed09/03/09 Page1 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP E. JEFFREY GRUBE (Cal. State Bar No. 167324) RISHI N. SHARMA (Cal. State Bar No. 239034) RYAN C. HESS (Cal. State Bar No. 263079) 55 Second Street, 24th Floor San Francisco, California 94105-3441 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] [e-mail] [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendant UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. MARK C. PETERS (Cal. State Bar No. 160611) DUCKWORTH · PETERS · LEBOWITZ LLP 235 Montgomery Street, Suite 1010 San Francisco, California 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] JOHN A. FURUTANI (Cal. State Bar No. 161757) FURUTANI & PETERS LLP 350 West Colorado Boulevard, Suite 200 Pasadena, California 91105 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff DANIEL KLINE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 20 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 21 22 DANIEL KLINE, 23 Plaintiff, 24 vs. 25 26 27 28
LEGAL_US_W # 62612087.1

No. C-09-0742 SI STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE

UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, Defendants.

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE

Case3:09-cv-00742-SI Document23

Filed09/03/09 Page2 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 By: 21 22 23 24 25 By: 26 27 28
LEGAL_US_W # 62612087.1

STIPULATION 1. On May 6, 2009, following the initial case management conference, the Court ordered the

parties to complete mediation with 150 days, or October 5, 2009. 2. The parties have participated in several telephone conferences with the Court's ADR staff

and the court-appointed mediator. During these conversations, it has been difficult to schedule the mediation given the parties' conflicting trial schedules and the pendency of 53 other individual wageand-hour lawsuits against United Parcel Service, Inc. alleging the same causes of action Plaintiff alleges in this action. The parties believe that until further cases proceed to trial, they will be unable to mediate a compromised valuation of Plaintiff's claim. 3. In addition, scheduling is made more difficult by the pendency of Lopez v. United Parcel

Service, Inc., No. C-08-5396 SI, and Rhinehart v. United Parcel Service, Inc., No. C-09-0741 SI, which are both before this Court, involve the same parties and legal claims, and have the same deadline to complete mediation. 4. Based on their trial schedules, the progress of discovery, and the desire to mediate this

case in conjunction with its related cases, the parties agree to continue the deadline to complete mediation to December 31, 2009, and ask the Court adopt the parties' stipulation. Dated: September 3, 2009. PAUL, HASTINGS, JANOFSKY & WALKER LLP E. JEFFREY GRUBE RISHI N. SHARMA RYAN C. HESS

/s/ Rishi N. Sharma

Rishi N. Sharma Attorneys for Defendant UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC. DATED: September 3, 2009. DUCKWORTH · PETERS · LEBOWITZ LLP FURUTANI & PETERS LLP

/s/ Mark C. Peters

MARK C. PETERS Attorneys for Plaintiff DANIEL KLINE

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE

Case3:09-cv-00742-SI Document23

Filed09/03/09 Page3 of 3

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
LEGAL_US_W # 62612087.1

[PROPOSED] ORDER Good causing appearing, the Court adopts the parties' stipulation as the order of the Court. The deadline to complete mediation is extended from October 5, 2009, to December 31, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September __, 2009. __________________________________________ Susan Illston United States District Judge

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE MEDIATION DEADLINE