Mcintosh v. Holder et al

Filing 182

ORDER TO RESPOND TO MCINTOSH'S MOTION REQUESTING ENTRY OF ORDER FOLLOWING SEPTEMBER 11, 2015 HEARING. (crblc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

RONALD J. MCINTOSH,
Plaintiff,

12

ORDER TO RESPOND TO MCINTOSH’S
MOTION REQUESTING ENTRY OF
ORDER FOLLOWING SEPTEMBER 11,
2015 HEARING

v.

13
14

No. 09-cv-00750 CRB

ERIC H. HOLDER JR.,
Defendant.

15

/

16

Defendant Ronald McIntosh has moved for an order directing the government to

17
18

produce discovery in compliance with prior orders of this Court. See Motion Requesting

19

Entry of Order Following September 11, 2015 Hearing (dkt. 178). McIntosh requests (1)

20

declarations regarding three government agencies’ search for responsive documents; (2)

21

unredacted sets of documents; (3) 174 pages of documents that this Court already ordered the

22

government to produce; (4) certain notes from law enforcement agents; (5) reports on certain

23

undercover government operations; and (6) information on certain meetings between federal

24

and state law enforcement agencies.
Good cause appearing therefor, the Government is hereby ORDERED to file a

25
26

response to Defendant’s motion by Monday, November 9, 2015, discussing the reasons, if

27

any, why the government should not be required to comply with McIntosh’s request, making

28

reference to which specific requests fall outside which specific prior discovery orders
//

1
2

issued by this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

3
4

Dated: November 2, 2015
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2