Mcintosh v. Holder et al

Filing 190

Order Re Requests for Clarification by Judge Charles R. Breyer. (crblc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/4/2015)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

RONALD J. MCINTOSH,
Plaintiff,

12

ORDER RE REQUESTS FOR
CLARIFICATION

v.

13
14

No. C09-00750 CRB

ERIC H. HOLDER JR.,
Defendant.

15

/

16
Now before the Court are Petitioner’s Requests for Clarification regarding the Court’s

17
18

November 12, 2015 Order. See Follow Up to Request for Clarification (dkt. 189); Request for

19

Clarification (dkt. 188); Order (dkt. 187). The Court ORDERS as follows:
1.

20

Counsel for McIntosh may review the 174 pages of discovery at issue as discussed in

21

the September 2015 Protective Order, and the FBI must allow counsel to review those

22

174 pages of discovery in accordance with that Protective Order, but the government

23

is not required to furnish counsel with a copy of those 174 pages.
2.

24

The under seal declaration regarding the undercover operation referenced in the
Court’s November 2015 Order, see Order (dkt. 187), shall be served on Petitioner.

25
3.

26

The government shall include in its declaration why agents’ notes of conversations
with Raiton concerning the Ewing homicide should not be disclosed.

27
28
//

1
2
3

4.

The declarations referred to above shall be produced to McIntosh and filed with the
Court on or before December 18, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

4
5

Dated: December 4, 2015
CHARLES R. BREYER
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2