Mcintosh v. Holder et al

Filing 48

ORDER granting 46 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply Motion for Ext. of Time to File a Response to Petitioner's Mot. for Indicative Relief under FRAP 12.1 filed by Eric H. Holder, Jr..Reset Deadlines as to 44 MOTION Indicative Ruling on Motion for Relief . Replies due by 10/10/2013. Motion Hearing set for 11/1/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 17th Floor, San Francisco before Hon. Charles R. Breyer. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 10/3/2013. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/3/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RONALD J. McINTOSH, Case No. C 09-0750 CRB (PR) 12 Petitioner, ORDER 13 v. 14 15 ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., et al, 16 Respondents. 17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that respondent shall have until September 26, 2013, to file 18 opposition to petitioner’s motion for indicative relief pursuant to F.R.A.P. 12.1. Petitioner’s reply 20 will be due by October 10, 2013. The hearing date is extended to November 1, 2013 at 10:00 21 a.m. ER H 26 27 Breyer LI RT 25 h Judge C FO arles R. NO 24 R NIA __________________________________ ED ORDER The Honorable Charles R. Breyer T IS SO I Dated: _October 3, 2013__ A 23 UNIT ED 22 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O S 19 N F D IS T IC T O R C 28 1 [Proposed] Order (C 09-0750 CRB (PR))

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?