Mcintosh v. Holder et al
Filing
65
ORDER granting 64 Ex Parte Application Petitioner's Motion for Order on Date of Discovery filed by Ronald J. Mcintosh. Discovery due by 2/17/2014.. Signed by Judge Charles R. Breyer on 1/29/2014. (beS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
BOERSCH SHAPIRO LLP
David W. Shapiro (CA Bar No. 219265)
Dshapiro@boerschshapiro.com
235 Montgomery Street, Suite 835
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone: (415) 500-6640
Attorney for Petitioner
RONALD J. MCINTOSH
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION
10
11
12
13
14
Case No.: 3:09-cv-00750 CRB
RONALD J. MCINTOSH,
Petitioner,
PETITIONER’S MOTION SETTING
DATE FOR DISCOVERY FROM
DEFENDANTS AND ORDER
v.
ERIC H. HOLDER, Attorney General, and
ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE
OF CALIFORNIA,
15
Respondents.
16
17
18
19
Petitioner Ronald J. McIntosh hereby moves the Court for an order setting February 17,
2014 as the date on which discovery in this case must be produced:
1.
On December 20, 2014, the Court granted McIntosh’s motion for discovery. The
20
defendants have been represented throughout the course of proceedings by the Assistant
21
Attorney General Pamela Critchfield.
22
2.
On December 30, 2014, after receiving no communications from the State (and after
23
the State’s attorney insisted that McIntosh was required to issue subpoenas to other offices in
24
order to obtain discovery), McIntosh requested that the Court enter a detailed order describing
25
the items to be produced by the federal and state governments.
26
3.
On January 7, 2014, the Court entered a detailed order for discovery.
27
4.
On January 7, 2014, after being advised by AAG Critchfield that she had not
28
contacted the federal government, McIntosh notified the Chief of the Criminal Division of the
1
PETITIONER’S MOTION SETTING DATE FOR
DISCOVERY FROM DEFENDANTS AND ORDER
3:09-CV-00750 CRB
1
United States Attorney’s Office that the Court ordered discovery by the federal government.
2
That notification was forwarded by the Criminal Chief to the Deputy Chief of the Strike Force,
3
AUSA Wilson Leung.
4
5.
On January 16, 2014, McIntosh forwarded a copy of the Court’s detailed discovery
5
order to AUSA Leung, the Deputy Chief of the Strike Force, and to Pamela Critchfield, the
6
Assistant Attorney General who has represented the defendants in this case since its inception.
7
6.
On or about January 16, 2014, McIntosh’s counsel spoke to AUSA Leung, provided
8
the background of the discovery motion, and discussed the steps AUSA Leung would take to
9
obtain the information ordered to be disclosed. AUSA Leung advised McIntosh that Ms.
10
Critchfield had not contacted the federal government about discovery (despite that fact that she is
11
listed as counsel for AG Holder on this Court’s and the Ninth Circuit’s docket).
12
13
14
15
7.
On January 23, 2014, McIntosh asked both Ms. Critchfield and Mr. Leung for the
status of their responses to the discovery order. Neither has responded.
8.
McIntosh requests that the Court order the state and federal governments to comply
with the discovery order on or before February 17, 2014.
16
17
Dated: January 27, 2014
BOERSCH SHAPIRO LLP
18
19
/s/ David W. Shapiro
David W. Shapiro
Counsel for Petitioner
RONALD J. MCINTOSH
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED:
S
UNIT
ED
25
26
27
RT
ER
H
28
FO
NO
R NIA
___________________________________
DERED
SO OR
HONORABLE CHARLES R. BREYER
IT IS
United States District Judge
. Breyer
harles R
Judge C
Dated: January 29, 2014
LI
24
RT
U
O
23
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
2
A
22
C
OF
D I S TMOTION SETTING DATE FOR
PETITIONER’S R I C T
N
DISCOVERY FROM DEFENDANTS AND ORDER
3:09-CV-00750 CRB
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?