Ante v. Office Depot Business Services et al
Filing
48
STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR INITIAL DISCLOSURES (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/1/2009)
Case3:09-cv-00752-WHA Document47
Filed06/30/09 Page1 of 3
Case3:09-cv-00752-WHA Document47
Filed06/30/09 Page2 of 3
1
Plaintitr I counseldelaycciengagingthe servicesof a Fo.r=8ic Economistto
Dr. JamesPlmnmer of QED Research. Inc.~hasbeenengaged Plaintiff and a report of by
5
6
his opinions, conclusionsand expertwitnesstestimonyregardjngthe loss of earning
7 capacity damages issue oot yetavailable. is
8 plaintiff is preparedto submit all other infonnation callm for in the initial
9 disclosure,but the partiesagreethat it would be efficiently handledby d~1aying the
10 disclosuredate a brief period of time.
t1
Dr. Plummerwas traveling abroadto pAnamA an approximateten-dayperiod for in the month of J\Dlefollowing d1eJ1me 11.2009 hearing. Dated: June30, 2009 RespectfullySubmitted,
LAW OFFICES OF JOHN B. McMORROW
12 13 14 15 16
By:
A Profe~/!_~~'Sim
/
/
-
---~:=~~~~~
11
Plaintiff. EARL G. ANl'B 18
19
20 Dated; June30, 2~ RespectfullySubmitted. LAW OFFICESWll..UAMS &. CONNOu. y , U.P
21
22
23
24 25
26
Att«ney for Defendauta OFFICE DEPOT BUSINESSSERVICES
27
28
'-~. QjN"~~ -~'--.CA-. ..~
S11PULATION BX"mNDING DBADUNB FOR.INmAL
DISa.m'URBS
BY FIVE BUSINESS DAYS
Case3:09-cv-00752-WHA Document47
Filed06/30/09 Page3 of 3
1 2 3 4 5 6
ORDER
It good causeappearing, IS SO ORDERED. IT
UNIT ED
S
S DISTRICT TE C TA
HonorableWilliam H. Alsup ER Judgeof the United States C Court, District N NorthernDistrictI S OF D CT
TRI
A
7
8 9
10
12
13
14
15
16 17 18 19
20
21 22
23 24 25 26 27
1-.
-1.iMIty
~CA""2ZM ~10)~1~1
~ " 28
54IMI. _ ~
STIPULAnON EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR INITIAL DISCLOSURESBY FIVE BUSINESSDAYS
/
I
)fiN B. McMORRow.AJ!C.
'
I
3
LI
FO
Dated:
July 1, 2009
Judge W
illiam A
lsup
R NIA
OO IT IS S
RDERE
D
RT U O
NO
RT
H
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?