Karnazes v. County of San Mateo et al

Filing 66

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST THAT THE COURT CONSIDER DISCOVERY FILINGS THAT ARE NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE DISCOVERY STANDING ORDER AND THE COURT'S PREVIOUS DISCOVERY ORDERS IN THIS CASE re 64 Affidavit filed by Elizabeth Karnazes. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/7/2010. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2010)

Download PDF
UNIT ED 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Plaintiff Elizabeth Karnazes, in pro per NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ELIZABETH KARNAZES, Plaintiff, vs. COUNTY OF SAN MATEO, DEBORAH TITONE, and DOES 1-35, inclusive. Defendants. ER N D IS T IC T R OF Case No.: 09-CV-00767-MMC (MEJ) DECLARATION OF ELIZABETH KARNAZES RE: EFFORTS TO COMPLY WITH DISCOVERY ORDERS AND REQUEST FOR RELIEF Date: April 6, 2010 Time: Place: Courtroom B, 15th Floor Chief Mag. Judge: Hon. Maria-Elena James TO THE COURT, ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD HEREIN PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff ELIZABETH KARNAZES (hereinafter referred to as "KARNAZES") submits the following Statement regarding efforts to comply with discovery orders herein: 1. I sincerely apologize for any inconvenience I have caused the court and counsel, and I am trying my best to comply with the court's orders. 2. I am unable to download and read the orders that the court is filing apparently against me. 3. I have tried to work with the web site personnel to resolve the issues, but have been informed that the court's web site is incompatible with my computer software. 4. I tried in good faith to comply with the court's discovery order prior to leaving for my prepaid non-refundable trip out of the USA. 5. I suffer from severe Post traumatic Stress Disorder, Depression and Anxiety. 6. Despite the fact that I have been in very bad shape for weeks, I have been doing my best to move this case forward and to comply with the orders of the court. 7. Prior to leaving the country on March 30, 2010, I tried my best to file my discovery letters with the court, and I reasonably believed that I could do so before I left. Dec. of Elizabeth Karnazes Discovery 04-06-2010 - 1 - Karnazes v. SMC Case No.: 09-CV-00767-MMC A C LI UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT Ju FO ria-Ele dge Ma na Jame s R NIA Elizabeth Karnazes CA SBN #118922 P.O. Box 4747 Foster City, California 94404 Telephone: (650) 345-9200 S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O D DENIE NO RT H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 8. I was buried in work including but not limited to an urgent ex parte matter, a; I was so stressed that I could not sleep, and my hands were in terrible pain. 9. Despite my best efforts, I was unable to file my letters before I left the country on March 30, 2010. 10. It took two days to arrive at my destination, and upon my arrival, I prepared and tried to e-file my discovery letters prior to April 5, 2010. 11. Unfortunately, the Internet was down and only working sporadically when I tried to e-file my letters. 12. I went out for a short time, and when I went back to my computer it had an error message that there was a RAID drive failure. 13. I tried to follow the instructions to save my data but was unable to do so. 14. The Internet and/or the court's web site were unavailable from April 2-5, 2010. 15. When I was able to get on the Internet, I e-filed a letter late Monday, April, 5, 2010, with the court then began re-writing my discovery letters. 16. I promptly filed my discovery letters on April 6, 2010, my first available opportunity to do so. 17. When I was able to check my e-mail, there was a message from the court that my letters were all stricken, but I was unable to download and read the court's order. 18. I respectfully request that the court accept my discovery letters, as I did the best I could to timely and properly e-file them. 19. My deposition was completed on March 12, 2010, at Defendants' attorney DAVID SILBERMAN'S (hereinafter referred to as "SILBERMAN") office at 400 County Center, in Redwood City, California 94063. 20. I met and conferred in good faith with Attorney SILBERMAN at his office on March 17, 2010, at Attorney SILBERMAN'S office at 400 County Center, in Redwood City, California 94063 at 2:00 p.m. 21. Defendants' attorney DAVID SILBERMAN'S (hereinafter referred to as "SILBERMAN") refused to meet and confer with me in good faith and refused to cooperate with me in a civil manner to present joint discovery letters to the court. 22. I am under my doctor's orders to reduce my stress and to try to relax, but I have been forced to work every day since I arrived at my destination. 23. I do not know what I did wrong, but whatever it was, I assure the court that it was not in any way a deliberate violation of the court's orders. - 2 - Karnazes v. SMC Case No.: 09-CV-00767-MMC Dec. of Elizabeth Karnazes Discovery 04-06-2010 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dec. of Elizabeth Karnazes Discovery 04-06-2010 - 3 - Karnazes v. SMC Case No.: 09-CV-00767-MMC 24. Attorney SILBERMAN did not respond in a reasonable good faith manner to my attempts to coordinate the discovery letters except to state that he was filing the letters without me. 25. I understood I had at least seven days from March 24, 2010, to respond, which I tried to do. 26. I will try my best to e-file this declaration today. 27. The foregoing statements are within my personal knowledge, and if called as a witness, I can testify competently thereto. 28. I declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California that the foregoing is true and correct, except as to those matters which are herein stated upon my information and belief, and as to those matters, I believe them to be true. Signed this 6th day of April 2010, . ELIZABETH KARNAZES, Declarant, Plaintiff Respectfully submitted this 6th day of April 2010, . ELIZABETH KARNAZES, Plaintiff in pro per

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?