Mitchell et al v. City of Pittsburg et al

Filing 184

ORDER RE: INTERVIEW WITH CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 4/16/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 TIMOTHY MITCHELL SR., et al. 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 No. C 09-00794 SI Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: INTERVIEW WITH CONFIDENTIAL INFORMANT v. CITY OF PITTSBURG, et al. 12 Defendants. / 13 14 On April 12, 2012, defendants’ attorney Peter Edrington submitted a letter informing the Court 15 that he has located the individual in Contra Costa County who has access/control over an audio 16 interview with the Confidential Informant, but requires a Court Order in order to receive a copy of the 17 interview or other relevant information related to the informant. See Dkt. 183; see also dkt. 168 18 (ordering defendants to disclose identity of Confidential Informant to plaintiffs). The Court hereby 19 ORDERS the Superior Court of California, in and for the County of Contra Costa, to provide to Peter 20 P. Edrington the original or copies of the relevant information related to the Confidential Informant as 21 requested. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 16, 2012 SUSAN ILLSTON United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?