Mitchell et al v. City of Pittsburg et al

Filing 223

ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENT AND DENYING REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/25/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

7
8

TIMOTHY MITCHELL, SR., et al.

9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12

No. C 09-00794 SI

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO
CONTINUE HEARING

v.
CITY OF PITTSBURG, et al.,
Defendants.

/

13
14

A hearing is scheduled for July 27, 2012 on defendants’ motions to reinstate summary judgment.

15

On July 23, 2012, plaintiffs’ counsel sent a letter to the Court attaching an exhibit that he inadvertantly

16

neglected to file with plaintiffs’ opposition to defendants’ motion, and requesting that the hearing on

17

the pending motions be continued so that defendants “may have plenty of time to consider it and

18

carefully respond.” Dkt. 219. That request to file the exhibit late is GRANTED; the request to continue

19

the hearing is DENIED. If they wish, defendants may file supplemental responses to plaintiffs’ exhibit.

20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Dated: July 25, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge