Mitchell et al v. City of Pittsburg et al
Filing
223
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST TO FILE DOCUMENT AND DENYING REQUEST TO CONTINUE HEARING (Illston, Susan) (Filed on 7/25/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
TIMOTHY MITCHELL, SR., et al.
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
No. C 09-00794 SI
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO
CONTINUE HEARING
v.
CITY OF PITTSBURG, et al.,
Defendants.
/
13
14
A hearing is scheduled for July 27, 2012 on defendants’ motions to reinstate summary judgment.
15
On July 23, 2012, plaintiffs’ counsel sent a letter to the Court attaching an exhibit that he inadvertantly
16
neglected to file with plaintiffs’ opposition to defendants’ motion, and requesting that the hearing on
17
the pending motions be continued so that defendants “may have plenty of time to consider it and
18
carefully respond.” Dkt. 219. That request to file the exhibit late is GRANTED; the request to continue
19
the hearing is DENIED. If they wish, defendants may file supplemental responses to plaintiffs’ exhibit.
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: July 25, 2012
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?