Trace-Wilco, Inc. v. Symantec Corporation
Filing
98
ORDER continuing cmc to 6/19/09. Signed by Judge Illston on Illston. (ts, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/5/2009)
Case 3:09-cv-00810-SI
Document 97
Filed 04/30/2009
Page 1 of 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
SPENCER HOSIE (CA Bar No. 101777) shosie@hosielaw.com BRUCE WECKER (CA Bar No. 078530) bwecker@hosielaw.com GEORGE F. BISHOP (CA Bar No. 89205) gbishop@hosielaw.com HOSIE RICE LLP 188 The Embarcadero, Suite 750 San Francisco, CA 94105 (415) 247-6000 Tel. (415) 247-6001 Fax
Attorneys for Plaintiff 8 TRACE-WILCO, INC.
9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17
Additional attorneys listed on signature page
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION TRACE-WILCO, INC., Case No. C 09-00810 SI Plaintiff, v. STIPULATED MOTION TO RESET INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
SYMANTEC CORPORATION, CISCO 18 SYSTEMS, INC., MCAFEE, INC. and GOOGLE, INC. 19
20 21 22
Defendants.
Pursuant to stipulation by and between the parties hereto, plaintiff Trace-Wilco, Inc.
23 and defendants Symantec Corporation ("Symantec"), Cisco Systems, Inc. ("Cisco"), 24 25
record, hereby request that the Initial Case Management Conference now scheduled for May McAfee, Inc. ("McAfee") and Google, Inc. ("Google"), through their respective attorneys of
26 27 28
STIPULATED MOTION TO RESET INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
15, 2009 be rescheduled to June 19, 2009, subject to the Court's schedule and availability.
1
CASE NO. C 09-00810 SI
Case 3:09-cv-00810-SI
Document 97
Filed 04/30/2009
Page 2 of 6
1 2
WHEREAS, there has been one previous extension, from April 3, 2009, to May
3 15, 2009. 4 5 6 7 8
Complaint, requested and received extensions of time in which to answer, to May 22, WHEREAS, subsequent to the first motion for extension, plaintiff on March 30, 2009 filed an unopposed motion to file a first amended complaint, adding as defendants Cisco, McAfee and Google. All three defendants, when served with the First Amended
9 2009. Thus, as a result of these extensions, the three new defendants will not have 10 answered until after the current date for the Case Management Conference, May 15. One 11 of the new defendants, McAfee, does not yet have litigation counsel for this matter. 12 13 14
STIPULATE that the date for the Case Management Conference be rescheduled for June Accordingly, in order to provide the newly-added defendants time to prepare for and fully participate in the Case Management Conference, the parties hereby
15 16
19, 2009, or as soon thereafter as is convenient for the Court. HOSIE RICE LLP
17 Dated: April 30, 2009 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATED MOTION TO RESET INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
/s/ George F. Bishop___________________ Spencer Hosie shosie@hosielaw.com Bruce Wecker bwecker@hosielaw.com George F. Bishop gbishop@hosielaw.com HOSIE RICE LLP 188 The Embarcadero, Suite 750 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 247-6000 Facsimile: (415) 247-6001 Raymond Pardo Niro rniro@nshn.com Dina M. Hayes
2
CASE NO. C 09-00810 SI
Case 3:09-cv-00810-SI
Document 97
Filed 04/30/2009
Page 3 of 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 April 30, 2009 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATED MOTION TO RESET INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
hayes@nshn.com Lee F. Grossman lgrossman@nshn.com NIRO SCAVONE HALLER & NIRO 181 W. Madison Street, Suite 4600 Chicago, IL 60602 Telephone: (312) 236-0733 Facsimile: (312) 236-3137 Attorneys for Plaintiff TRACE-WILCO, INC.
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES LLP /s/ Jennifer A. Kash___________________ Jennifer A. Kash jenniferkash@quinnemanuel.com Sean S. Pak seanpak@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700
David A. Nelson davenelson@quinnemanuel.com Michael F. Harte mikeharte@quinnemanuel.com Christopher R. Freeman chrisfreeman@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES LLP 250 S. Wacker Drive, Suite 230 Chicago, IL 60601 Telephone: (312) 463-2967 Facsimile: (312) 463-2962
Attorneys for Defendant SYMANTEC CORPORATION
3
CASE NO. C 09-00810 SI
Case 3:09-cv-00810-SI
Document 97
Filed 04/30/2009
Page 4 of 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
April 30, 2009
DUANE MORRIS LLP /s/ Eric J. Sinrod Eric J. Sinrod ejsinrod@duanemorris.com DUANE MORRIS LLP One Market, Spear Tower, Suite 2000 San Francisco, CA 94105 Telephone: (415) 957-3000 Facsimile: (415) 957-3001 Attorneys for Defendant CISCO SYSTEMS, INC.
April 30, 2009
QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES LLP /s/ Jennifer A. Kash___________________ Jennifer A. Kash jenniferkash@quinnemanuel.com QUINN EMANUEL URQUHART OLIVER & HEDGES LLP 50 California Street, 22nd Floor San Francisco, CA 94111 Telephone: (415) 875-6600 Facsimile: (415) 875-6700 Attorney for Defendant GOOGLE, INC.
19 April 30, 2009 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATED MOTION TO RESET INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
MCAFEE, INC. /s/ Carter Hopkins Carter Hopkins carter_hopkins@mcafee.com MCAFEE, INC. 5000 Headquarters Drive Plano, TX 75024 Telephone: (972) 987-2666 Attorneys for Defendant MCAFEE, INC.
4
CASE NO. C 09-00810 SI
Case 3:09-cv-00810-SI
Document 97
Filed 04/30/2009
Page 5 of 6
1 2 3 4 5
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 Pursuant to General Order 45X.B, I, George F. Bishop, attest that the above signatories for the Defendants have concurred and consented to the filing of this document.
6 DATED: April 30, 2009 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
STIPULATED MOTION TO RESET INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
/s/George F. Bishop____________ George F. Bishop
5
CASE NO. C 09-00810 SI
Case 3:09-cv-00810-SI
Document 97
Filed 04/30/2009
Page 6 of 6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED Dated: _____________ ________________________________ Honorable Susan Illston JUDGE OF THE U.S. DISTRICT COURT
STIPULATED MOTION TO RESET INITIAL CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
6
CASE NO. C 09-00810 SI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?