Sloan v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Signed by Judge Vaughn R Walker on 5/12/2009. (Attachments: # 1 proof of service)(cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/12/2009)
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 This civil rights action by a prisoner was filed on February 26, 2009. Doc #1. The court notified plaintiff in writing v FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, Respondent. / AHMED SLOAN, Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL No C-09-0837 VRW (PR) IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
at that time that the action was deficient because he did not pay the requisite $ 350.00 filing fee or, instead, submit a signed and completed court-approved in forma pauperis application, including a completed certificate of funds in the prisoner's account and a copy of the prisoner's trust account statement for the last six months. See 28 USC § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff was advised that failure to file
the requested items within thirty days would result in dismissal of the action. Doc #3. On March 12, 2009, the mail sent by the court Doc #4.
was returned as undeliverable to plaintiff.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
More than two months have elapsed since plaintiff was notified of his filing deficiency; however, he has not provided the court with the requisite items, or sought an extension of time to do so. Further, plaintiff has failed to provide the court with a Because more than sixty days have passed
current mailing address.
since the court's mail to plaintiff was returned, the case is DISMISSED without prejudice pursuant to Civil Local Rule 3-11(b). The Clerk shall close the file and terminate all pending motions as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
VAUGHN R WALKER United States District Chief Judge
G:\PRO-SE\VRW\CR.09\Sloan-09-0837.order of dismissal.wpd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?