Zynga Game Network, Inc. v. CLZ Concepts et al

Filing 18

STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SPERO FOR SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE re doc 17 filed by Zynga Game Network, Inc. Signed by Chief Judge Vaughn R Walker on 5/20/2009. (cgk, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/20/2009)

Download PDF
Case 3:09-cv-00854-VRW Document 17 Filed 05/15/2009 Page 1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & WEST LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O JEDEDIAH WAKEFIELD (CSB No. 178058) jwakefield@fenwick.com JENNIFER L. KELLY (CSB No. 193416) jkelly@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP 555 California Street, 12th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: (415) 875-2300 Facsimile: (415) 281-1350 HENRY Z. CARBAJAL III (CSB No. 237951) hcarbajal@fenwick.com FENWICK & WEST LLP Silicon Valley Center 801 California Street Mountain View, CA 94041 Telephone: (650) 988-8500 Facsimile: (650) 938-5200 Attorneys for Plaintiff ZYNGA GAME NETWORK, INC. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 v. ZYNGA GAME NETWORK, INC., a Delaware corporation Plaintiff, Case No. 3:09-cv-00854 VRW STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR REFERRAL TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE SPERO FOR EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Judge: Hon. Vaughn R. Walker CLZ CONCEPTS D/B/A AFTERSHOCK INNOVATIONS LLC, JEFF CHEN and JAMES ZHANG, Defendants. STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR REFERRAL FOR EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE CASE NO. 3:09-CV-00854 VRW Case 3:09-cv-00854-VRW Document 17 Filed 05/15/2009 Page 2 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & WEST LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-12 and ADR Local Rules 7-2 and 7-3, Plaintiff Zynga Game Network, Inc. ("Zynga") and Defendants Aftershock Innovations LLC (named as CLZ Concepts LLC d/b/a Aftershock Innovations LLC), Jeff Chen and James Zhang (collectively "Defendants"), by and through their respective counsel, hereby agree and stipulate as follows: 1. The parties request referral of this matter for an Early Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. 2. No party to this stipulation will urge that this joint request for an early settlement conference before Judge Spero has any bearing on either the subject matter jurisdiction of this Court or the arbitrability of all or any portion of this suit. Dated: May 15, 2009 FENWICK & WEST LLP By: /s/ Jedediah Wakefield Jedediah Wakefield 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR REFERRAL FOR EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE Attorneys for Plaintiff ZYNGA GAME NETWORK, INC. Dated: May 15, 2009 ORRICK, HERRINGTON & SUTCLIFFE LLP By: /s/ Annette L. Hurst Annette L. Hurst Attorneys for Defendants AFTERSHOCK INNOVATIONS LLC (NAMED AS CLZ CONCEPTS LLC D/B/A AFTERSHOCK INNOVATIONS LLC), JEFF CHEN AND JAMES ZHANG ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO GENERAL ORDER 45 Pursuant to General Order 45, I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the signatory indicated by a "conformed" signature (/s/) within this e-filed document. Dated: May 15, 2009 FENWICK & WEST LLP By: /s/ Jedediah Wakefield Jedediah Wakefield Attorneys for Plaintiff ZYNGA GAME NETWORK, INC. -1CASE NO. 3:09-CV-00854 VRW Case 3:09-cv-00854-VRW Document 17 Filed 05/15/2009 Page 3 of 3 1 2 3 4 [PROPOSED] ORDER PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED that this matter is referred for an Early Settlement Conference before Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero. May 20 Dated: _______________, 2009 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 FENWICK & WEST LLP A T T O R N E Y S A T LAW S A N FR A N C I S C O UNIT ED 5 By: The Honorable Vaughan R. Walker United States ORDERED District Judge S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O ER N F D IS T IC T O R 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 STIP. & [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR REFERRAL FOR EARLY SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE -2­ CASE NO. 3:09-CV-00854 VRW A C LI alker ghn R W au Judge V FO R NIA O IT IS S NO RT H

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?