Simon v. Adzilla, Inc [New Media] et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION Second Stipulation Extending The Time By Which Defendant Conducive Corporation Must Respond To The Complaint by Conducive Corporation. (Rescher, Owen) (Filed on 4/23/2009)

Simon v. Adzilla, Inc [New Media] et al

Doc. 17

Case3:09-cv-00879-MMC Document17

Filed04/23/09 Page1 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Christopher T. Holland [SBN 164053] ([e-mail]) Owen J. Rescher [SBN 214678] ([e-mail]) KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP 114 Sansome Street, 4th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] Attorneys for Defendant CONDUCIVE CORPORATION Alan Himmelfarb [SBN 90480] ([e-mail]) KAMBEREDELSON, LLC 2527 Leonis Boulevard Vernon, CA 90058 Telephone: [phone] Attorneys for Plaintiff SUSAN SIMON, individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SUSAN SIMON, individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. ADZILLA, INC (NEW MEDIA), et al. Defendants.

Case No.: 3:09-cv-00879 MMC SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING THE TIME BY WHICH DEFENDANT CONDUCIVE CORPORATION MUST RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT Complaint filed: Feb. 27, 2009

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between: Plaintiff Susan Simon, individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated ("Plaintiff"), and defendant Conducive Corporation, through their undersigned counsel, as follows: 1. Plaintiff filed her Complaint in this action against defendant Conducive

____________________________________________________________________________ SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING THE TIME BY WHICH DEF. CONDUCIVE CORP. MUST RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 3:09-cv-00879 MMC
Dockets.Justia.com

Case3:09-cv-00879-MMC Document17

Filed04/23/09 Page2 of 2

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Corporation and other defendants on February 27, 2009. 2. Plaintiff and defendant Conducive Corporation agree to extend the deadline by

which defendant Conducive Corporation must respond to Plaintiff's Complaint in this action from April 24, 2009, to and including May 26, 2009. 3. This stipulation will not alter the date of any event or any deadline already fixed

by Court Order. IT IS SO STIPULATED. Dated: April 23, 2009 KRIEG, KELLER, SLOAN, REILLEY & ROMAN LLP

By:

_/s/_________________________________ OWEN J. RESCHER Attorneys for Defendant Conducive Corporation

Dated: April 23, 2009

KAMBEREDELSON, LLC

By:

_/s/_________________________________ ALAN HIMMELFARB Attorneys for Plaintiff Susan Simon, individual, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated1

1

Concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained by counsel for defendant Conducive Corporation. ____________________________________________________________________________ SECOND STIPULATION EXTENDING THE TIME BY WHICH DEF. CONDUCIVE CORP. MUST RESPOND TO THE COMPLAINT CASE NO.: 3:09-cv-00879 MMC