Simon v. Adzilla, Inc [New Media] et al

Filing 25

STIPULATION re 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction Notice of Motion and Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint for Lack of Personal Jurisdiction and supporting memo and Proposed Order by Susan Simon. (Himmelfarb, Alan) (Filed on 5/21/2009)

Download PDF
Simon v. Adzilla, Inc [New Media] et al Doc. 25 Case3:09-cv-00879-MMC Document25 Filed05/21/09 Page1 of 4 ALAN HIMMELFARB- SBN 90480 1 KAMBEREDELSON, LLC 2757 Leonis Boulevard 2 Los Angeles, California 90058 t: 323.585.8696 3 f: 323.585.6195 ahimmelfarb@kamberedelson.com 4 JOSEPH H. MALLEY (admitted pro hac vice) 5 Law Office of Joseph H. Malley, PC 1045 North Zang Boulevard 6 Dallas, TX 75208 214-943-6100 7 malleylaw@gmail.com 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUSAN SIMON and the putative class 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 SUSAN SIMON, individually, on behalf of 14 herself and all others similarly situated, 15 16 17 v. Plaintiffs, SECOND STIPULATION REGARDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT CONTINENTAL VISINET BROADBAND LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS AND TO CONTINUE HEARING DATE The Hon. Maxine M. Chesney Case No.: C09-00879-MMC ADZILLA, INC.; CONDUCIVE 18 CORPORATION; CONTINENTAL VISINET BROADBAND, INC.; CORE 19 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. d/b/a CORETEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al. 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 6-1, Plaintiff and Defendant Continental Visinet Broadband LLC ("Continental Visinet") hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. The time for Plaintiff to file a response to Continental Visinet's Motion to Dismiss (Dkt. No. 9) is extended to July 2, 2009. 1 Case No. 3:09-cv-00879-MMC 28 Second Stipulation Regarding Time for Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Continental Visinet's Motion to Dismiss and to Continue Hearing Date Dockets.Justia.com Case3:09-cv-00879-MMC Document25 Filed05/21/09 Page2 of 4 1 2 3 2. 3. 4. Plaintiff filed her complaint on February 27, 2009. Continental Visinet filed its Motion to Dismiss on March 30, 2009. This is the second request for an extension of time concerning a response to 4 Continental Visinet's Motion to Dismiss. 5 5. The parties request this extension to allow Plaintiff and Defendant Continental 6 Visinet to finalize their discussions regarding a non-judicial resolution of the matter through 7 informal discussions. The parties have agreed in principal to such a resolution and require 8 additional time in which to finalize details to formally implement the non-judicial resolution as to 9 Continental Visinet. 10 6. Plaintiff has entered into previous stipulations with defendants Conducive and 11 CoreTel to provide these defendants additional time to file a responsive pleading or otherwise 12 respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. 13 7. This requested time modification will require the Court to reschedule the hearing 14 on Defendant Continental Visinet's Motion to Dismiss, which is currently scheduled for June 12, 15 2009 at 9:00 a.m. The parties propose that the Court reschedule the hearing for Friday, July 24, 16 2009 at 9:00 a.m. 17 Dated: May 21, 2009 18 19 20 Dated: May 21, 2009 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Second Stipulation Regarding Time for Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Continental Visinet's Motion to Dismiss and to Continue Hearing Date By: /s/ Alan Himmelfarb KAMBEREDELSON, LLC Attorney for Plaintiffs By: /s/ Martin L. Fineman DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP Attorney for Defendant Continental Visinet Broadband LLC. 2 Case No. 3:09-cv-00879-MMC Case3:09-cv-00879-MMC Document25 Filed05/21/09 Page3 of 4 ALAN HIMMELFARB- SBN 90480 1 KAMBEREDELSON, LLC 2757 Leonis Boulevard 2 Los Angeles, California 90058 t: 323.585.8696 3 f: 323.585.6195 ahimmelfarb@kamberedelson.com 4 JOSEPH H. MALLEY (admitted pro hac vice) 5 Law Office of Joseph H. Malley, PC 1045 North Zang Boulevard 6 Dallas, TX 75208 214-943-6100 7 malleylaw@gmail.com 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff SUSAN SIMON and the putative class 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 12 13 SUSAN SIMON, individually, on behalf of 14 herself and all others similarly situated, 15 16 17 v. Plaintiffs, PROPOSED ORDER REGARDING TIME FOR PLAINTIFF'S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT CONTINENTAL VISINET BROADBAND LLC'S MOTION TO DISMISS The Hon. Maxine M. Chesney Case No.: C09-00879-MMC ADZILLA, INC.; CONDUCIVE 18 CORPORATION; CONTINENTAL VISINET BROADBAND, INC.; CORE 19 COMMUNICATIONS, INC. d/b/a CORETEL COMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al. 20 Defendants. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs Time For 28 Plaintiff's Response To Defendant Continental Visinet's Motion To Dismiss and to Continue Hearing Date Case No. 3:09-cv-879-MMC Case3:09-cv-00879-MMC Document25 Filed05/21/09 Page4 of 4 1 Now before the Court is Plaintiff's and Defendant Continental Visinet Broadband LLC's 2 Stipulation Regarding Time for Plaintiff's Response to Defendant Continental Visinet's Motion to 3 Dismiss. Upon consideration of the stipulation, this Court is of the opinion that Plaintiff shall 4 have until July 2, 2009 to respond to Defendant Continental Visinet's Motion to Dismiss. The 5 hearing on Defendant Continental Visinet's Motion to Dismiss is hereby set for Friday, July 24, 6 2009 at 9:00 a.m. 7 8 9 10 DATED: __________________ 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Proposed Order Granting Plaintiffs Time For Visinet's Motion To Dismiss and to Continue Hearing Date PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. By: ________________________________ Hon. Maxine M. Chesney United States District Court 28 Plaintiff's Response To Defendant Continental 1 Case No. 3:09-cv-879-MMC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?