Exergetic Systems, LLC v. Energy Future Holding Corp et al

Filing 50

STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE with prejudice; Signed by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel on 2/22/2010. (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/22/2010)

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

MICHAEL E. DERGOSITS (SBN 118206) TODD A. NOAH (SBN 152328) TED K. JOE (SBN 242589) DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP Three Embarcadero Center, Suite 410 San Francisco, California 94111 Tel: [phone] Fax: [phone] E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] E-mail: [e-mail] Attorneys for Plaintiff EXERGETIC SYSTEMS, LLC

ARTHUR S. BEEMAN (SBN 237996) PAMELA K. FULMER (SBN 154736) BRETT A. LOVEJOY (SBN 212942) JONES DAY 555 California St., 26th Floor San Francisco, CA 94104-1500 Telephone: [phone] Facsimile: [phone] email: [e-mail] email: [e-mail] email: [e-mail] Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants EDISON MISSION ENERGY and MIDWEST GENERATION, LLC

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EXERGETIC SYSTEMS, LLC, Plaintiff, v. EDISON MISSION ENERGY; and MIDWEST GENERATION LLC, Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS

Case No. 09-0883-MHP STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER RE: DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER Case No.: CV-09-0883 MHP

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22

Exergetic Systems, LLC and Midwest Generation LLC, and Edison Mission Energy, ("the Parties") hereby stipulate, through their respective counsel of record, that this action be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to the terms of the Parties' Settlement Agreement, executed on February 10, 2010. IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: February 19, 2010

DERGOSITS & NOAH LLP /s/ Michael E. Dergosits Attorneys for Plaintiff and Counterdefendant EXERGETIC SYSTEMS, LLC By:

Dated: February 19, 2010

JONES DAY By: /s/ Arthur S. Beeman Attorneys for Defendants and Counterclaimants EDISON MISSION ENERGY and MIDWEST GENERATION LLC

I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from Defendants' counsel, Arthur S. Beeman. /s/ Michael E. Dergosits IT IS SO ORDERED.

24 25 26 27 28 -2-

UNIT ED

23

22 Dated: February ___, 2010

S

S DISTRICT TE C TA

C F D IS T IC T O R STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
N
Case No.: CV-09-0883 MHP

ER

A

LI

FO

ari Judge M

lyn H. P

atel

R NIA

_________________________ Hon. Marilyn H. Patel D DERE UnitedSO OR IS States District Judge IT

RT U O

NO

RT

H