Johnson et al v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District et al
Filing
325
ORDER SUBSTITUTING COUNSEL re (41 in 3:09-cv-04014-EMC) Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Oscar Julius Grant, Jr. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/7/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2014)
2
3
4
5
LAW OFFICES OF PANOS LAGOS
Panos Lagos, Esq. ISBN 61821
5032 Woodminster Lane
Oakland, CA 94602
(51 0)530-4078
(51 0)530-47251F ~
panoslagos@aol.coi(l
Attorney for Plaintiff,
OSCAR JULIUS GRANT, JR.
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
OSCAR JULIUS GRANT, JR.,
Plaintiff,
II
12
v.
13
BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, et al.,
14
15
16
Defendants.
RELATED CASES:
C09-0901 EMC (LEAD CASE)
C09-4835 EMC
Ct0-1005 EMC
) SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY
)
THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES ARE NOTIFIED THAT:
Plaintiff, OSCAR JULIUS GRANT, JR., makes the following substitution:
Former legal counsel:
LAW OFFICES OF PANOS LAGOS
Panos Lagos, Esq. I SBN 61821
5032 Woodminster Lane
Oakland, CA 94602
(510)530-4078
(51 0)530-4 725/FAX
panosJagos@aol.com
New legal counsel:
Waukeen McCoy, Esq.
Law Offices ofWaukeen McCoy
703 Marke~ Street, Suite 1300
San Francisco, CA 94103
415.675.7705
415.675.2530 I FAX
wqm@mccoyslaw.com
19
20
21
22
~
~)
~~--------------------------------)
17
18
} Case No.: C09-04014 EMC
)
23
24
25
26
27
Dated:
28
o/ - 3 -
J L(
Ill
SUBSTITUTION OF AITORNEY
CASE NO.: C09-04014 EMC
-I-
I, PANOS LAGOS, consent to this substitution
~
2
3
Dated: March 28, 2014
4
I, WAUKEEN McCOY, accept this substitur...._........_
·
5
6
7
Dated:
q.-~ ,_ I lf
8
9
13
15
16
D
TE
GRAN
RT
U
O
14
R NIA
12
S
II
IT IS SO ORDERED. The hearing on Panos Lagos' motion
to withdraw set for 4/8/14 at 10:30 a.m. is hereby
vacated.
____________________
EDWARD M. ES DISTRICT
CHEN
C
AT
U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE
T
UNIT
ED
10
17
21
FO
LI
ER
A
H
20
RT
19
. Chen
dward M
Judge E
NO
18
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY
CASE NO.: C09-04014 EMC
• 2.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?