Johnson et al v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District et al

Filing 325

ORDER SUBSTITUTING COUNSEL re (41 in 3:09-cv-04014-EMC) Notice of Substitution of Counsel filed by Oscar Julius Grant, Jr. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 4/7/14. (bpf, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/7/2014)

Download PDF
2 3 4 5 LAW OFFICES OF PANOS LAGOS Panos Lagos, Esq. ISBN 61821 5032 Woodminster Lane Oakland, CA 94602 (51 0)530-4078 (51 0)530-47251F ~ panoslagos@aol.coi(l Attorney for Plaintiff, OSCAR JULIUS GRANT, JR. 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 OSCAR JULIUS GRANT, JR., Plaintiff, II 12 v. 13 BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, et al., 14 15 16 Defendants. RELATED CASES: C09-0901 EMC (LEAD CASE) C09-4835 EMC Ct0-1005 EMC ) SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY ) THE COURT AND ALL PARTIES ARE NOTIFIED THAT: Plaintiff, OSCAR JULIUS GRANT, JR., makes the following substitution: Former legal counsel: LAW OFFICES OF PANOS LAGOS Panos Lagos, Esq. I SBN 61821 5032 Woodminster Lane Oakland, CA 94602 (510)530-4078 (51 0)530-4 725/FAX panosJagos@aol.com New legal counsel: Waukeen McCoy, Esq. Law Offices ofWaukeen McCoy 703 Marke~ Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, CA 94103 415.675.7705 415.675.2530 I FAX wqm@mccoyslaw.com 19 20 21 22 ~ ~) ~~--------------------------------) 17 18 } Case No.: C09-04014 EMC ) 23 24 25 26 27 Dated: 28 o/ - 3 - J L( Ill SUBSTITUTION OF AITORNEY CASE NO.: C09-04014 EMC -I- I, PANOS LAGOS, consent to this substitution ~ 2 3 Dated: March 28, 2014 4 I, WAUKEEN McCOY, accept this substitur...._........_ · 5 6 7 Dated: q.-~ ,_ I lf 8 9 13 15 16 D TE GRAN RT U O 14 R NIA 12 S II IT IS SO ORDERED. The hearing on Panos Lagos' motion to withdraw set for 4/8/14 at 10:30 a.m. is hereby vacated. ____________________ EDWARD M. ES DISTRICT CHEN C AT U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE T UNIT ED 10 17 21 FO LI ER A H 20 RT 19 . Chen dward M Judge E NO 18 N F D IS T IC T O R C 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY CASE NO.: C09-04014 EMC • 2.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?