Johnson et al v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District et al

Filing 514

ORDER Re Redactions to Exhibit 237 (emclc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/9/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 WANDA JOHNSON, et al., 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Plaintiffs, v. BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, et al., 12 13 14 Defendants. ___________________________________/ No. C-09-0901 EMC CONSOLIDATED CASES C-09-4014 EMC (Grant) C-09-4835 EMC (Bryson, et al.) C-10-0005 EMC (Caldwell) ORDER RE REDACTIONS TO EXHIBIT 237 AND RELATED ACTIONS. ___________________________________/ 15 16 Plaintiff Caldwell has moved to have Exhibit 237 – notes from Caldwell’s psychologist taken 17 during Caldwell’s appointments – redacted to remove (1) a reference to Caldwell having thrown the 18 cell phone and (2) Oscar Grant, III having been involved in the BART train. Caldwell bases this 19 request on the Court’s motion in limine rulings that these two facts were properly excluded under 20 Fed. R. Evid. 403. Defendant Domenici opposes these proposed redactions on the grounds that 21 these facts, in the context of Exhibit 237, are directly relevant to the question of whether Domenici’s 22 alleged constitutional violations caused any harm to Caldwell. 23 As to the cell phone issue, Caldwell seeks to redact the following: “I got so upset after Oscar 24 was shot until I threw my cell phone at the officer. But feeling better after M[ehserle] was charged.” 25 The Court finds that this statement made by Caldwell to his psychologist is relevant insofar as it 26 suggests that the emotional distress Caldwell suffered was caused by the shooting of Oscar Grant, 27 III, not any action taken by Domenici. The Court will allow this statement in, but Defense counsel 28 are again advised to not emphasize, unduly draw attention to, or attempt to make argument from the 1 fact that Caldwell threw the cell phone. If the Court concludes that Defense counsel is attempting to 2 make improper arguments resulting from Caldwell’s throwing of the cell phone, the Court will 3 immediately instruct the jury on the limited nature of this evidence to the Fourth Amendment 4 inquiry they are facing. 5 6 Regarding Oscar Grant, III’s alleged involvement in the fight on the BART train, Caldwell seeks to redact the following: 7 We were returning from SF on BART and got into a fight with some dude who said something to Oscar at West Oakland. At Fruitvale we were told to get off and I got off, the fight was a dead issue. These officers ran up on the platform . . . grabbed Mike, took Oscar and pushed him to the ground. We weren’t resisting but cops were hollowing stop resisting. Some were pushing people back on train with tasers. One officer shot Oscar and the others were just standing there looking at him. They were commanded to get back on BART. I got a phone call from Sophenia telling me Oscar got shot. I got off at next station and came back to Fruitvale and was told they took him to Highland. When I got there, they told me he passed. 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 He was my best friend. We talked every day. I just sit, have to drink to calm down, feel nervous a lot not eating. Reliving incident when my sister was shot by her boyfriend. Crying all the time. 14 15 Domenici argues she should be permitted to explore with Caldwell’s psychologist whether 16 Caldwell’s “guilt” stemmed “From his inability to prevent the fight on the train or break it up 17 sooner.” Dkt. No. 513, at 6. While there may be some relevance to this argument, the Court finds it 18 is outweighed by the risk of unfair prejudice to Oscar Grant, Jr. and creates the risk of a mini-trial as 19 to the circumstances underlying the alleged fight. Domenici will be able to explore whether 20 Caldwell’s guilt was derived from Grant III’s death and the occurrences of that night unrelated to 21 her 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 1 alleged actions against Caldwell. However, she will not be permitted to include the reference to the 2 fight on the BART train. Accordingly, the phrase “and got into a fight with some dude who said 3 something to Oscar at West Oakland” and “the fight was a dead issue” will be redacted. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED 6 7 Dated: June 9, 2014 8 _________________________ EDWARD M. CHEN United States District Judge 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?