Johnson et al v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District et al

Filing 520

WRIT of Writ of Habeas Corpus and Testificandum issued. Signed by Judge Edward M. Chen on 6/10/14. (bpfS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/11/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 WAUKEEN Q. MCCOY, ESQ. (SBN: 168228) LAW OFFICES OF WAUKEEN Q. McCOY 703 Market Street, Suite 1300 San Francisco, California 94103 Telephone: (415) 675-7705 Facsimile: (415) 675-2530 E-mail: mail@mccoyslaw.com Attorney for Plaintiff, OSCAR GRANT JR. 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT 9 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 10 11 OSCAR GRANT JR., an individual, Plaintiff, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 v. BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT; GARY GEE, in his official capacity as CHIEF OF POLICE for BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, JOHANNES MEHSERLE individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for BART; ANTHONY PIRONE, individually and in his personal capacity as a police officer for BART; MARYSOL DOMENICI, individually and in her official capacity as a police officer for BART; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Case No. C09-00901 EMC Related Cases: C09-04014 EMC (Oscar Grant Jr.) C09-04835 EMC (Bryson, et. al) C09-00005 EMC (Caldwell) WRIT WRITE OF HABEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM Trial Date: June 9, 2014 Judge: Edward M. Chen 21 22 Defendants. 23 24 25 26 Oscar Grant Jr., is a named plaintiff in the case Wanda Johnson et. al. v. Bay Area Rapid Transit et. al., Case No. 09-CV-00901. Mr. Grant is currently confined in CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON, SOLANO, 2100 Peabody Road Vacaville, CA 95696 or P.O. Box 4000 27 28 28 Vacaville, CA 95696. He is a necessary party at his trial which began on June 9, 2014. To allow 1 Oscar Grant Jr.’s Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum 1 for Mr. Grant’s participation in said trial, it is necessary that a Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad 2 Testificandum be issued, commanding the custodian to produce the inmate before this Court, 3 Courtroom 5 on the 17th Floor of the Phillip Burton Federal Building and United States 4 Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102 on June 9, 2014 at 8:00 am and 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 throughout the duration of the trial. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED that: 1. A Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum Issue, under the seal of this Court commanding the Warden of the California State Prison, Solano, 2100 Peabody Road Vacaville, CA 95696 or P.O. Box 4000 Vacaville, CA 95696 to produce the inmate to Courtroom 5 on the 17th Floor of the Phillip Burton Federal Building and United States 13 Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102 on June 9, 2014 at 8:00 14 am and throughout the duration of the trial at 8:00 am Monday through Wednesday and 15 Friday until completion of said trial; and 16 2. Upon completion of the trial, and upon satisfaction of this writ by the Court, Oscar Grant 17 18 19 Jr. shall be returned to Solano County State Prison under safe and secure conduct each day at the end of the court day and permanently at the completion of this trial. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 28 2 Oscar Grant Jr.’s Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum 1 2 WRIT OF HABEEAS CORPUS AD TESTIFICANDUM TO THE WARDEN OF CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON, SOLANO,’ 3 We COMMAND you to produce the inmate named above to Courtroom 5 on the 17th 4 Floor of the Phillip Burton Federal Building and United States Courthouse, 450 Golden Gate 5 Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94102 on June 9, 2014 at 8:00 am and throughout the duration of the 6 trial at 8:00 am Monday through Wednesday and Friday until the completion of trial at which 7 point the inmate will return to the above institution pursuant to the conditions set forth above. 8 S RT 14 ER 16 A H 15 R NIA United States District Court Judge en d M. Ch e Edwar Judg NO 13 ED ORDER S SOM. Chen D JudgeT I I Edward DIFIE AS MO FO 12 _____________________________________ LI 11 UNIT ED 10 Dated: June 10, 2014 RT U O 9 S DISTRICT TE C TA N D IS T IC T R OF C 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 28 3 Oscar Grant Jr.’s Writ of Habeas Corpus Ad Testificandum

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?