Johnson et al v. Bay Area Rapid Transit District et al

Filing 75

ORDER by Judge Marilyn Hall Patel granting #74 Amended Petition for Compromise Minor Claims (awb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/19/2010)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 JOHN L. BURRIS, Esq. SBN 69888 ADANTÉ D. POINTER Esq. SBN 236229 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS Airport Corporate Centre 7677 Oakport Street, Suite 1120 Oakland, California 94621 Telephone: (510) 839-5200 Facsimile: (510) 839-3882 John.Burris@johnburrislaw.com Adante.Pointer@johnburrislaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiffs UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION WANDA JOHNSON, individually and as personal representative of the ESTATE of OSCAR J. GRANT III, the ESTATE OF OSCAR J. GRANT III, SOPHINA MESA as Guardian Ad Litem of minor, T.G. Plaintiffs, v. Case No. C 09-cv-00901 MHP AMENDED PETITION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO COMPROMISE MINOR PLAINTIFF T.G.'S CLAIM Proposed Date: March 15, 2010 Time: 2:00 p.m. Judge: Marilyn Hall Patel BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT; GARY GEE, in his official capacity as CHIEF OF POLICE for BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT, JOHANNES MEHSERLE individually and in his official capacity as a police officer for BART; ANTHONY PIRONE, individually and in his personal capacity as a police officer for BART; MARYSOL DOMENICI, individually and in her official capacity as a police officer for BART; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, Defendants. / REDACTED FOR E-FILING AMENDED PETITION & [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PETITION TO COMPROMISE MINOR T.G.'S CLAIMS 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Petitioner SOPHINA MESA respectfully represents and requests: 1. Petitioner SOPHINA MESA is the natural mother of minor plaintiff T.G. She has custody of the minor plaintiff. Minor Plaintiff T.G. is the daughter of decedent Oscar Grant, and was born in the year 2004. 2. Minor Plaintiff has causes of action against the named defendants herein on which a lawsuit was brought in this court for violation of civil rights under Federal and State statutes. 3. Minor Plaintiff's causes of action arise out of the death of decedent Oscar Grant during a detention and arrest which occurred on January 1, 2009. As alleged in the Complaint, Minor Plaintiff suffered the loss of her relationship with her father, caused by the use of deadly force against decedent by Defendant Officers. 4. Plaintiff Sophina Mesa as guardian ad litem for T.G. and Defendants have reached a settlement in this matter. The total settlement is in the amount of $1,500,00.00. Minor Plaintiff T.G.'s settlement will be structured as set forth below. a. T.G. : $ 1,500,000.00 $ $ 375,000.00 36,573.19 Attorneys Fees (25%) : Share of Costs : Total Net Settlement : $ 1,088,426.81 Respectfully submitted, Dated: March 16, 2010 LAW OFFICES OF JOHN L. BURRIS /s/ Adanté D. Pointer ADANTÉ D. POINTER Attorney for Plaintiffs AMENDED PETITION & [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PETITION TO COMPROMISE MINOR T.G.'S CLAIMS 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ORDER Good cause being shown, this court hereby makes the following orders: 1. The Petition for the Approval of the Compromise of Minor T.G.'s claims submitted by Petitioner Sophina Mesa as guardian ad litem for T.G. is approved; 2. T.G.'s claims against the Defendants are hereby compromised in consideration of $1,500,000.00. 3. $375,000.00 of the $1,500,000.00 total settlement amount is to be paid to the Law Offices of John L. Burris for attorney fees. 4. $36,573.19 of the total settlement amount is to be paid to the Law Offices of John L. Burris for costs and expenses. IT IS SO ORDERED. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 HONORABLE MARILYN HALL PATEL ED UNITED STATESSO ORDER DISTRICT COURT JUDGE lyn H. P atel UNIT ED 17 Dated: 3/18/2010 S S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O ER N F D IS T IC T O R A C LI FO ari Judge M R NIA IT IS AMENDED PETITION & [PROPOSED] ORDER APPROVING PETITION TO COMPROMISE MINOR T.G.'S CLAIMS NO RT H 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?