Yufa v. Lighthouse Worldwide Solutions Inc.

Filing 13

ORDER FOR PARTIES TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION. Signed by Judge Maria-Elena James on 4/27/2009. (mejlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/27/2009)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 27, 2009 MARIA-ELENA JAMES United States Magistrate Judge Pending before the Court is Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Upon review of the record in this action, the Court notes that the parties have not filed written consents to Magistrate Judge James' jurisdiction. This civil case was randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge James for all purposes including trial. In accordance with Title 28, U.S.C. § 636(c), the magistrate judges of this district court are designated to conduct any and all proceedings in a civil case, including trial and entry of final judgment, upon the consent of the parties. An appeal from a judgment entered by Magistrate Judge James may be taken directly to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit in the same manner as an appeal from any other judgment of a district court. You have the right to have your case assigned to a United States District Judge for trial and disposition. Accordingly, the parties shall inform the court, by way of the enclosed form, whether they consent to Magistrate Judge James' jurisdiction or request reassignment to a United States District Judge for trial. The parties shall inform the Court of their decision by May 14, 2009. IT IS SO ORDERED. vs. LIGHTHOUSE WORLDWIDE SOLUTION, INC., et al., Defendant(s). / IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALEKSANDR YUFA, Plaintiff(s), No. C 09-0968 MEJ ORDER DIRECTING PARTIES TO FILE CONSENT/DECLINATION FORM 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: April 27, 2009 Aleksandr L. Yufa 698 Cypress Avenue Colton, CA 92324 ALEKSANDR L. YUFA, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA Case Number: CV09-00968 MEJ CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE LIGHTHOUSE WORLDWIDE SOLUTION et al, Defendant. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on April 27, 2009, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Brenda Tolbert, Deputy Clerk 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 vs. IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ALEKSANDR L. YUFA, Plaintiff(s), No. C 09-0968 MEJ CONSENT TO ASSIGNMENT OR REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT LIGHTHOUSE WORLDWIDE SOLUTIONS Defendant(s). / CONSENT TO PROCEED BEFORE A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE In accordance with the provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 636(c), the undersigned party hereby consents to have a United States Magistrate Judge conduct any and all further proceedings in this case, including trial, and order the entry of final judgment, and voluntarily waives the right to proceed before a United States District Judge. Dated:________________________ Signed by: ____________________________ Counsel for:_____________________________ REQUEST FOR REASSIGNMENT TO A UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE The undersigned party hereby declines to consent to the assignment of this case to a United States Magistrate Judge for trial and disposition and hereby requests the reassignment of this case to a United States District Judge. Dated: ________________________ Signed by: _____________________________ Counsel for: ____________________________ 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?