Histon v. Tilton et al
Filing
37
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO QUASH; DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO PROVIDE PLAINTIFF WITH MEDICAL RECORDS; EXTENDING TIME. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/2/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)
1
2
3
4
5
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
LARRY HISTON,
Plaintiff,
9
10
11
12
13
v.
JAMES TILTON, et al,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. C 09-0979 JSW (PR)
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS
TO QUASH; DIRECTING
DEFENDANT TO PROVIDE
PLAINTIFF WITH MEDICAL
RECORDS; EXTENDING TIME
(Docket Nos. 35 & 36)
14
Plaintiff, currently incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison in San Quentin,
15
California, filed this civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The allegations
16
in Plaintiff’s amended complaint that certain Defendant Dr. Clarene David and others
17
were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs were found to state cognizable
18
claims for relief. Dr. David has filed a motion for summary judgment, and Plaintiff was
19
granted an extension of time to November 8, 2011, in which to file an opposition.
20
Dr. David and non-party San Quentin State Prison have each filed a motion to
21
quash a subpoena for documents. As the subpoena fails to comply with the technical
22
requirements of Rule 45, including setting forth the proper text and allowing sufficient
23
time to respond, the motions to quash are GRANTED. However, Plaintiff’s request for a
24
copy of his prison medical records is reasonable. Defendant has not shown that this
25
would be unduly burdensome, and Plaintiff’s medical records are certainly relevant to
26
his claims that he received insufficient medical care. Accordingly, Defendant shall
27
provide Plaintiff with a copy of either his entire medical record, or alternatively only
28
1
those medical records pertaining to the medical conditions and medical care alleged in
2
the amended complaint, within 10 days of the date this order is filed. If Defendant
3
chooses the latter course and provides less than all of Plaintiff’s medical records,
4
Defendant shall show cause for doing so, also within 10 days of the date this order is
5
filed. In order to show cause, Defendant shall show specifically why each record not
6
provided is not relevant to Plaintiff’s claims; general or conclusory statements that
7
records are not relevant will not suffice. No extensions of these deadlines will be
8
granted or considered. Defendant’s failure to comply with this order will result in
9
sanctions, which may include the denial of Defendant’s motion for summary judgment.
10
A brief extension of time for Plaintiff to file any opposition to the summary
11
judgment motion is GRANTED to and including November 18, 2011. No further
12
extensions of time will be granted. Defendant shall file a reply brief on or before
13
December 1, 2011.
14
IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
DATED: November 2, 2011
16
17
JEFFREY S. WHITE
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
FOR THE
3
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
4
5
6
LARRY HISTON,
7
8
9
10
Case Number: CV09-00979 JSW
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
JAMES TILTON et al,
Defendant.
/
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on November 2, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Larry Histon
J79124
San Quentin State Prison
San Quentin, CA 94974
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Dated: November 2, 2011
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?