Histon v. Tilton et al

Filing 37

ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO QUASH; DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO PROVIDE PLAINTIFF WITH MEDICAL RECORDS; EXTENDING TIME. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 11/2/11. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/2/2011)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 LARRY HISTON, Plaintiff, 9 10 11 12 13 v. JAMES TILTON, et al, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 09-0979 JSW (PR) ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO QUASH; DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO PROVIDE PLAINTIFF WITH MEDICAL RECORDS; EXTENDING TIME (Docket Nos. 35 & 36) 14 Plaintiff, currently incarcerated at San Quentin State Prison in San Quentin, 15 California, filed this civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The allegations 16 in Plaintiff’s amended complaint that certain Defendant Dr. Clarene David and others 17 were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs were found to state cognizable 18 claims for relief. Dr. David has filed a motion for summary judgment, and Plaintiff was 19 granted an extension of time to November 8, 2011, in which to file an opposition. 20 Dr. David and non-party San Quentin State Prison have each filed a motion to 21 quash a subpoena for documents. As the subpoena fails to comply with the technical 22 requirements of Rule 45, including setting forth the proper text and allowing sufficient 23 time to respond, the motions to quash are GRANTED. However, Plaintiff’s request for a 24 copy of his prison medical records is reasonable. Defendant has not shown that this 25 would be unduly burdensome, and Plaintiff’s medical records are certainly relevant to 26 his claims that he received insufficient medical care. Accordingly, Defendant shall 27 provide Plaintiff with a copy of either his entire medical record, or alternatively only 28 1 those medical records pertaining to the medical conditions and medical care alleged in 2 the amended complaint, within 10 days of the date this order is filed. If Defendant 3 chooses the latter course and provides less than all of Plaintiff’s medical records, 4 Defendant shall show cause for doing so, also within 10 days of the date this order is 5 filed. In order to show cause, Defendant shall show specifically why each record not 6 provided is not relevant to Plaintiff’s claims; general or conclusory statements that 7 records are not relevant will not suffice. No extensions of these deadlines will be 8 granted or considered. Defendant’s failure to comply with this order will result in 9 sanctions, which may include the denial of Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. 10 A brief extension of time for Plaintiff to file any opposition to the summary 11 judgment motion is GRANTED to and including November 18, 2011. No further 12 extensions of time will be granted. Defendant shall file a reply brief on or before 13 December 1, 2011. 14 IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 DATED: November 2, 2011 16 17 JEFFREY S. WHITE United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 FOR THE 3 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 5 6 LARRY HISTON, 7 8 9 10 Case Number: CV09-00979 JSW Plaintiff, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. JAMES TILTON et al, Defendant. / 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. That on November 2, 2011, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Larry Histon J79124 San Quentin State Prison San Quentin, CA 94974 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Dated: November 2, 2011 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk By: Jennifer Ottolini, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?