Jackson et al v. City Of Pittsburg et al

Filing 167

ORDER RE FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. Signed by Judge William Alsup on 7/6/2010. (whasec, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/6/2010)

Download PDF
Jackson et al v. City Of Pittsburg et al Doc. 167 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FREDERICK JACKSON, ASHLEY NICOLE JACKSON, a minor, BRIANA FREDRANIQUE ANNETTE JACKSON, a minor, and SHAWN YVETTE MARTIN, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF PITTSBURG, AARON L. BAKER, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Pittsburg Police Department, G. LOMBARDI, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 275), C. SMITH, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 285), P. DUMPA, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Bade # 291), WILLIAM BLAKE HATCHER, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 274), and DOES 1­100, inclusive, Defendants. / ORDER RE FINAL PRETRIAL CONFERENCE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 No. C 09-01016 WHA Did defense filed an excessive number of motions in limine? The Court's guidelines advise that usually no more than four or five motions in limine need to be resolved prior to the opening statements and the balance can be resolved as the trial proceeds. This is because in actual trial practice, many supposed motions in limine fall away as unnecessary given the way the case is actually tried. Therefore, prior to tomorrow's final pretrial conference, defendants must Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 select six of their motions in limine to be heard at the final pretrial conference with the remainder to be presented and decided as the trial progresses. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 6, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?