Jackson et al v. City Of Pittsburg et al

Filing 171

FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER. Signed by Judge Alsup on July 8, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/8/2010)

Download PDF
Jackson et al v. City Of Pittsburg et al Doc. 171 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FREDERICK JACKSON, ASHLEY NICOLE JACKSON, a minor, BRIANA FREDRANIQUE ANNETTE JACKSON, a minor, and SHAWN YVETTE MARTIN, Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF PITTSBURG, AARON L. BAKER, individually and in his official capacity as Chief of Police of the City of Pittsburg Police Department, G. LOMBARDI, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 275), C. SMITH, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 285), P. DUMPA, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Bade # 291), WILLIAM BLAKE HATCHER, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 274), and DOES 1100, inclusive, Defendants. / FINAL PRETRIAL ORDER IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California No. C 09-01016 WHA 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 For good cause and after a final pretrial conference, the Court issues the following final pretrial order: 1. This case shall go to a JURY TRIAL on JULY 12, 2010, at 7:30 A.M., and shall continue until completed on the schedule discussed at the conference. The issues to be tried shall be those set forth in the joint proposed pretrial order except to the extent modified by order in limine. This final pretrial order supersedes all the complaint, answer and any counterclaims, Dockets.Justia.com 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 cross-claims or third-party complaints, i.e., only the issues expressly identified for trial remain in the case. 2. Rulings on the motions in limine shall be summarized jointly by counsel and submitted by JULY 9, 2010, AT NOON. 3. Except for good cause, each party is limited to the witnesses and exhibits disclosed in the joint proposed final pretrial order less any excluded or limited by an order in limine. Materials or witnesses used solely for impeachment need not be disclosed and may be used, subject to the rules of evidence. 4. The stipulations of facts set forth in the joint proposed final pretrial order are approved and binding on all parties. 5. 6. A jury of 8 PERSONS shall be used. Each side shall have 12 HOURS to examine witnesses (counting direct United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 examination, cross-examination, re-direct examination, re-cross examination, etc.). Opening statements and closing arguments shall not count against the limit. If, despite being efficient, non-duplicative, and non-argumentative in the use of the allotted time, one side runs out of time and it would be a miscarriage of justice to hold that side to the limit, then more time will be allotted. 7. The parties shall follow the Court's current Guidelines for Trial and Final Pretrial Conference, separately provided and available on the Internet at http://www.cand.uscourts.gov, which guidelines are incorporated as part of this order. 8. The motion to file a second amended complaint is granted and the current answer will be deemed the answer thereto. 9. Each side may submit by JULY 8, 2010, AT 5 PM., briefing of up to 5 pages regarding the effect (if any) on this matter of the recent Ninth Circuit decision, Bryan v. Macpherson, 2010 WL 2431482 (June 18, 2010). 10. proper form. By JULY 9, 2010, AT NOON, the parties shall submit revised expert reports in 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11. Plaintiffs shall submit by JULY 8, 2010, AT 5 PM., a written explanation of no more than 5 pages regarding why they should be permitted to call their witness Pamela Jackson even though she was not timely disclosed. Defendants shall submit a reply of no more than 5 pages by JULY 9, 2010, AT 5 P.M. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: July 8, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?