Jackson et al v. City Of Pittsburg et al

Filing 253

ORDER REGARDING DISPUTE OVER BILL OF COSTS. Signed by Judge Alsup on September 28, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/28/2010)

Jackson et al v. City Of Pittsburg et al

Doc. 253

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FREDERICK JACKSON, ASHLEY NICOLE JACKSON, and BRIANA FREDRANIQUE ANNETTE JACKSON, Plaintiffs, v. GERALD VINCENT LOMBARDI, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 275), CORY LEE SMITH, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 285), SANKARA REDDY DUMPA, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 291), WILLIAM BLAKE HATCHER, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 274), Defendants. / No. C 09-01016 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ORDER REGARDING DISPUTE OVER BILL OF COSTS

The parties have submitted bills of costs and objections to the costs submitted by the other side. Given the separate entry of amended judgment concurrent with this order, both sides are the prevailing parties so as to claim costs. The practical thing to do is for both sides to agree that the costs to which they are entitled cancel each other out so no one will receive any costs, subject to restoring the status quo ante if the court of appeals disturbs the judgment. The parties shall please submit a statement indicating whether they agree to this by NOON ON SEPTEMBER 30, 2010. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: September 28, 2010.

WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dockets.Justia.com