Jackson et al v. City Of Pittsburg et al

Filing 266

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT by Judge Alsup denying 265 Motion to Alter Judgment (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/26/2010)

Jackson et al v. City Of Pittsburg et al

Doc. 266

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FREDERICK JACKSON, ASHLEY NICOLE JACKSON, and BRIANA FREDRANIQUE ANNETTE JACKSON, Plaintiffs, v. GERALD VINCENT LOMBARDI, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 275), CORY LEE SMITH, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 285), SANKARA REDDY DUMPA, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 291), WILLIAM BLAKE HATCHER, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 274), Defendants. / No. C 09-01016 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

United States District Court

11
For the Northern District of California

12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO ALTER OR AMEND JUDGMENT

Defendants have filed a motion styled as a motion to alter or amend judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e). This motion is DENIED. It is basically a repeat of the earlier renewed motion for judgment as a matter of law. Again, any problem with the special verdict form should have been raised by counsel prior to the jury verdict, not afterward. The hearing noticed for December 9, 2010, is VACATED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 26, 2010.

WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Dockets.Justia.com

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

28 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2

27

26

25

24

23

22

21

20

19

18

17

16

15

14

13

12

11

10

1

2