Jackson et al v. City Of Pittsburg et al

Filing 287

ORDER REGARDING ATTORNEY'S FEES LETTER OF DEFENSE COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Alsup on December 7, 2010. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/7/2010)

Download PDF
Jackson et al v. City Of Pittsburg et al Doc. 287 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 FREDERICK JACKSON, ASHLEY NICOLE JACKSON, and BRIANA FREDRANIQUE ANNETTE JACKSON, Plaintiffs, v. GERALD VINCENT LOMBARDI, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 275), CORY LEE SMITH, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 285), SANKARA REDDY DUMPA, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 291), WILLIAM BLAKE HATCHER, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 274), Defendants. / No. C 09-01016 WHA IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court 11 For the Northern District of California 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER REGARDING ATTORNEY'S FEES LETTER OF DEFENSE COUNSEL In light of the large amount of fees being requested by Mr. Lagos, he shall answer in detail the questions posed in the letter of Mr. Lepper dated December 3 (but filed on December 6) by MONDAY, DECEMBER 13, 2010, AT NOON. This shall be by declaration under oath. Defendants' deadline to oppose the amount of fees requested in plaintiff's submissions is accordingly extended to DECEMBER 27, 2010, AT NOON. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: December 7, 2010. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dockets.Justia.com

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?