Jackson et al v. City Of Pittsburg et al

Filing 307

ORDER REGARDING THE PARTIES' CHALLENGES TO THE SPECIAL MASTER'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION. Signed by Judge Alsup on April 14, 2011. (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/14/2011)

1
2
3
4
5
6

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
FREDERICK JACKSON, et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14

Plaintiffs,
v.

ORDER REGARDING THE
PARTIES’ CHALLENGES TO THE
SPECIAL MASTER’S REPORT AND
RECOMMENDATION

CITY OF PITTSBURG, et al.,
Defendants.
/

15
16

No. C 09-01016 WHA

Both sides have filed submissions challenging the special master’s report and

17

recommendation regarding attorney’s fees. Defense counsel filed “objections,” and plaintiff’s

18

counsel filed a “motion to modify” the report. For sake of efficiency in resolving the parties’

19

challenges to the report and recommendation, both sides’ submissions will be treated as

20

objections, to be resolved without a hearing. Accordingly, the hearing plaintiff’s counsel

21

noticed for its motion to modify on May 12 is VACATED. The objections by both sides will be

22

considered and addressed by a written order in due course.

23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: April 14, 2011.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE