Jackson et al v. City Of Pittsburg et al
Filing
338
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOLLOWING REMAND (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
FREDERICK JACKSON, ASHLEY NICOLE
JACKSON, and BRIANA FREDRANIQUE
ANNETTE JACKSON,
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
No. C 09-01016 WHA
Plaintiffs,
v.
GERALD VINCENT LOMBARDI, individually
and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police
Department (Badge # 275), CORY LEE SMITH,
individually and as an officer of the City of
Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 285),
SANKARA REDDY DUMPA, individually and
as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police
Department (Badge # 291), WILLIAM BLAKE
HATCHER, individually and as an officer of the
City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge #
274),
ORDER SETTING
BRIEFING SCHEDULE
FOLLOWING REMAND
Defendants.
/
This action has been remanded by our court of appeals to determine “whether or not to
23
award costs to Jackson as the prevailing party.” Plaintiff has previously filed a bill of costs (Dkt.
24
No. 216). Defendants have filed an opposition to certain items in the bill of costs, to which
25
plaintiff has filed a reply (Dkt. Nos. 227 and 240).
26
Plaintiff may file a brief in support of an award of costs by MAY 6. Defendants’
27
opposition or statement of non-opposition thereto is due by MAY 20. Plaintiff’s reply, if any, is
28
due by MAY 27. As the parties have fully briefed whether specific items in the bill of costs are
properly taxable, the parties’ briefs should not rehash these arguments and should instead focus
1
on whether the Court, in its discretion, should award costs to Jackson as the prevailing party. No
2
hearing date will be set at this time.
3
4
IT IS SO ORDERED.
5
6
Dated: April 17, 2013.
WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?