Jackson et al v. City Of Pittsburg et al

Filing 338

ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOLLOWING REMAND (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/17/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 FREDERICK JACKSON, ASHLEY NICOLE JACKSON, and BRIANA FREDRANIQUE ANNETTE JACKSON, 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 No. C 09-01016 WHA Plaintiffs, v. GERALD VINCENT LOMBARDI, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 275), CORY LEE SMITH, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 285), SANKARA REDDY DUMPA, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 291), WILLIAM BLAKE HATCHER, individually and as an officer of the City of Pittsburg Police Department (Badge # 274), ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOLLOWING REMAND Defendants. / This action has been remanded by our court of appeals to determine “whether or not to 23 award costs to Jackson as the prevailing party.” Plaintiff has previously filed a bill of costs (Dkt. 24 No. 216). Defendants have filed an opposition to certain items in the bill of costs, to which 25 plaintiff has filed a reply (Dkt. Nos. 227 and 240). 26 Plaintiff may file a brief in support of an award of costs by MAY 6. Defendants’ 27 opposition or statement of non-opposition thereto is due by MAY 20. Plaintiff’s reply, if any, is 28 due by MAY 27. As the parties have fully briefed whether specific items in the bill of costs are properly taxable, the parties’ briefs should not rehash these arguments and should instead focus 1 on whether the Court, in its discretion, should award costs to Jackson as the prevailing party. No 2 hearing date will be set at this time. 3 4 IT IS SO ORDERED. 5 6 Dated: April 17, 2013. WILLIAM ALSUP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?