Jackson et al v. City Of Pittsburg et al

Filing 342

ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES ON APPEAL re 340 Letter filed by Frederick Jackson, 339 USCA Order, (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2013)

1
2
3
4
5

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
7
8
9

FREDERICK JACKSON et al.,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13

No. C 09-01016 WHA

Plaintiffs,
v.

ORDER REGARDING
BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S
FEES ON APPEAL

CITY OF PITTSBURG, et al.,
Defendants.
/

14
15

On April 16, 2013, our court of appeals issued an order transferring to this Court the

16

consideration of plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees on appeal (Dkt. No. 339). Counsel for

17

plaintiff has filed a letter stating that the motion has already been fully briefed and requesting

18

that all briefing and related documents submitted to the court of appeals on this motion be

19

refiled herein for consideration by this Court. Plaintiff’s counsel represents that opposing

20

counsel joins in this request. No opposition has been received from defendants.

21

Accordingly, the request is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall electronically file the briefs and

22

supporting documents related to plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees on appeal. No further

23

briefing on the motion should be filed, with the exception of any after-acquired material facts

24

relevant to the motion or statements of recent decision pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(d). Of

25

course, defendant may file objections to the extent that plaintiff’s refiling of the documents

26

herein is incomplete or incorrect.

27
28

IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 6, 2013.

WILLIAM ALSUP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE