Jackson et al v. City Of Pittsburg et al
ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES ON APPEAL re 340 Letter filed by Frederick Jackson, 339 USCA Order, (whalc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/6/2013)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
FREDERICK JACKSON et al.,
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 09-01016 WHA
BRIEFING ON PLAINTIFF’S
MOTION FOR ATTORNEY’S
FEES ON APPEAL
CITY OF PITTSBURG, et al.,
On April 16, 2013, our court of appeals issued an order transferring to this Court the
consideration of plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees on appeal (Dkt. No. 339). Counsel for
plaintiff has filed a letter stating that the motion has already been fully briefed and requesting
that all briefing and related documents submitted to the court of appeals on this motion be
refiled herein for consideration by this Court. Plaintiff’s counsel represents that opposing
counsel joins in this request. No opposition has been received from defendants.
Accordingly, the request is GRANTED. Plaintiff shall electronically file the briefs and
supporting documents related to plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees on appeal. No further
briefing on the motion should be filed, with the exception of any after-acquired material facts
relevant to the motion or statements of recent decision pursuant to Local Rule 7-3(d). Of
course, defendant may file objections to the extent that plaintiff’s refiling of the documents
herein is incomplete or incorrect.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: May 6, 2013.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?