Walker v. United States of America
ORDER [AS MODIFIED] Granting Request for Continuance re 5 . Initial Case Management Conference reset for 8/4/2009 10:00 AM. Signed by Judge Elizabeth D. Laporte on 6/10/09. (lmh, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/10/2009)
ALFRED G. JOHNSON, SBN 38790 LAW OFFICES OF LYLE C. CAVIN, JR. 201 Fourth Street, Suite 102 Oakland, California 94607 (510) 444-2501 Attorneys for Plaintiff Joe Walker
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOE WALKER, Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. / Case No. C 09-01034 EDL PLAINTIFF'S REQUEST TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND PROPOSED ORDER AS MODIFIED
Plaintiff, Joe Walker, by and through his attorneys, requests that the case management conference currently set for June 16, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. before the Honorable Elizabeth D. Laporte be continued to July 28, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. Good cause exists for this continuance as the case is not yet at issue. The sole defendant, the United States of America, has not answered plaintiff's Complaint and is not scheduled to do so until June 22, 2009, which is after the presently set Case Management Conference. Dated: June 9, 2009 LAW OFFICES OF LYLE C. CAVIN, JR.
/s/ Alfred G. Johnson Attorneys for Plaintiff Joe Walker
1 Plaintiff's Request to Continue Case Management Conference & Proposed Order (Case No. C 09-01034 EDL)
[PROPOSED] ORDER As this case is not yet at issue, good cause exists to continue the Case August 4, 2009 Management Conference presently set for June 16, 2009, to July 28, 2009, at 10:00 a.m. Case Management Statement shall be filed by July 28, 2009. Dated: 6/10/09
S DISTRICT TE C TA MAGISTRATE JUDGE OF THE FEDERAL COURT
RT U O
ELIZABETH D. LAPORTE
F D IS T IC T O R
2 Plaintiff's Request to Continue Case Management Conference & Proposed Order (Case No. C 09-01034 EDL)
D. lizabeth Judge E
D RDERE S SO O IED IT I DIF AS MO
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?