Young v. Holmes et al

Filing 116

ORDER GRANTING 115 STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 20, 2012. Case Management Statement due by 6/1/2012. Case Management Conference set for 6/8/2012 01:30 PM in Courtroom 11, 19th Floor, San Francisco. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on April 4, 2012. (jswlc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2012)

Case3:09-cv-01042-JSW Document115 Filed04/04/12 Page1 of 4

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

STEPHEN J. AKERLEY (No. 160757)
TINA SORIANO (No. 254777)
HEIDI GUETSCHOW (No. 257900)
MANROOP PUREWAL (No. 267528)
DECHERT LLP
2440 W. El Camino Real, Suite 700
Mountain View, California 94040-1499
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 650/813-4848
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
MURIEL M. KOROL (No. 261909)
DECHERT LLP
One Maritime Plaza, Suite 2300
San Francisco, California 94111-3513
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415/262-4555
[e-mail]
Counsel for Plaintiff
EARL YOUNG

13
14
15
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23

EARL YOUNG,

No. C 09-1042 JSW
Plaintiff,

v.
T. HOLMES, et al.
Defendants.

STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER
CHANGING TIME FOR CASE
MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE
SCHEDULED FOR APRIL 20, 2012
ORDER THEREON
Action Filed:
March 10, 2009

24
25
26
27
28
STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR
APRIL 20, 2012
No. C 09-1042 JSW

Case3:09-cv-01042-JSW Document115 Filed04/04/12 Page2 of 4

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, Plaintiff Young and Defendants Holmes, Bullock, Buchanan,

1
2

Kiplinger, Kingstrom, Northrup, and Shellabarger (“Parties”), by and through their respective

3

counsel of record, hereby stipulate to change the time of the case management conference

4

scheduled for April 20, 2012 (the “Case Management Conference”) for the following reasons:

5

A.

6

Plaintiff’s lead trial counsel will be unavailable on April 20, 2012, the date that the Case

7

Management Conference is currently scheduled for. (Order Granting in Part Stipulated Request

8

for Order Changing Time for Settlement Conference before Judge Nandor J. Vadas and for Order

9

Continuing Case Management Conference Scheduled for March 2, 2012, Feb. 15, 2012, Dkt. No.

10

Reasons for the Change of Time

110.)

11

In addition, the parties believe that a later Case Management Conference after the

12

settlement conference scheduled for May 10, 2012 before Magistrate Judge Nandor J. Vadas (the

13

“Settlement Conference”) serves the interests of judicial and party efficiency. (Notice and Order

14

Setting Settlement Conference in Pro Se Prisoner Early Settlement Program, March 9, 2012, Dkt.

15

No. 111.)

16

B.

17

The Court has previously granted Defendants three extensions of time to file a dispositive

Previous Time Modifications

18

motion. (Order Denying Mot. Appoint Counsel & Default, Oct. 20, 2009, Dkt. No. 12; Order

19

Granting Defs.’ 2nd EOT, Nov. 2, 2009, Dkt. No. 17; Order Granting Defs.’ 3rd EOT, Jan. 8,

20

2010, Dkt. No. 27.)

21

The Court has also granted the Parties’ previous stipulated request to continue the

22

Settlement Conference and the Case Management Conference. (Order Granting in Part Stipulated

23

Request for Order Changing Time for Settlement Conference before Judge Nandor J. Vadas and

24

for Order Continuing Case Management Conference Scheduled for March 2, 2012, Feb. 15,

25

2012, Dkt. No. 110; Notice and Order Setting Settlement Conference in Pro Se Prisoner Early

26

Settlement Program, March 9, 2012, Dkt. No. 111.)

27

C.

Effect the Requested Time Modification Will Have on Schedule

28

The Parties respectfully request the Court to reschedule the aforementioned Case
-1STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR
APRIL 20, 2012
No. C 09-1042 JSW

Case3:09-cv-01042-JSW Document115 Filed04/04/12 Page3 of 4

1

Management Conference at the Court's earliest convenience following the parties' May 10

2

Settlement Conference. The Parties do not believe that the requested time modification will

3

affect the trial schedule.

4

D.

5

Per the Court’s request, the Parties respectfully propose that the Case Management

6

Proposed Dates

Conference be rescheduled to either Friday, June 8 or Friday, June 15.

7
8
9
10
11
12

Dated: April 4, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF CALIFORNIA
KAMALA D. HARRIS
WILLIAM C. KWONG
SHARON A. GARSKE
VIRGINIA I. PAPAN

DECHERT LLP
STEPHEN J. AKERLEY
TINA P. SORIANO
HEIDI A. GUETSCHOW
MURIEL M. KOROL
MANROOP S. PUREWAL

/s/ Sharon A. Garske
SHARON A. GARSKE
Deputy Attorney General

/s/ Stephen J. Akerley
STEPHEN J. AKERLEY

Counsel for Defendants
HOLMES, BULLOCK, BUCHANAN,
KIPLINGER, KINGSTROM,
NORTHRUP, AND
SHELLABARGER

Counsel for Plaintiff
EARL YOUNG

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20

Filer’s Attestation: I attest under penalty of perjury that concurrence in the filing of the
document has been obtained from its signatory.

21
22
23

Dated: April 4, 2012

Respectfully submitted,
/s/ Stephen J. Akerley
STEPHEN J. AKERLEY

24
25
26
27
28

-2STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR
APRIL 20, 2012
No. C 09-1042 JSW

1
2

Case3:09-cv-01042-JSW Document115 Filed04/04/12 Page4 of 4
The Case Management Conference is
CONTINUED to June 8, 2012 at 1:30
p.m. The parties shall file a further
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
joint case management statement by
Dated: April 4
___, 2012
no later than June 1, 2012.

3
4
______________________________
Honorable Jeffrey S. White
United States District Judge

5
6
7

14385271

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-3STIPULATED REQUEST FOR ORDER CHANGING TIME FOR CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE SCHEDULED FOR
APRIL 20, 2012
No. C 09-1042 JSW