Young v. Holmes et al

Filing 119

ORDER GRANTING 117 Notice OF WITHDRAWAL OF MANROOP PUREWAL AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD. Signed by Judge Jeffrey S. White on 4/6/12. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/6/2012)

Download PDF
Case3:09-cv-01042-JSW Document117-1 Filed04/05/12 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 13 14 EARL YOUNG, 15 16 17 18 19 No. C 09-1042 JSW Plaintiff, v. R. BELL, T. BUCHANAN, M. BULLOCK, M. COOK, M. FOSS, T. HOLMES, R. HOREL, D. KAYS, K. KIPLINGER, J. KINGSTROM, L. NORTHRUP, B. ROGERS, R. SHELLABARGER, Defendants. 20 [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WITHDRAWAL OF MANROOP PUREWAL AS ATTORNEY OF RECORD Action Filed: Dept: Judge: March 10,2009 Courtroom 11, 19th Floor Hon. Jeffrey S. White 21 22 23 Having considered the request of Plaintiff Earl Young to allow Manroop Purewal, 24 formerly of Dechert LLP, to withdraw his appearance as counsel of record for Plaintiff Earl 25 Young in this action, 26 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. Plaintiff Earl Young's request is GRANTED; 28 2. Manroop Purewal is relieved as counsel of record for Plaintiff Earl Young; and -1- DECHERT LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WITHDRAWAL OF MANROOP PUREWAL As ATTORNEY OF RECORD CASE No. C 09-1042 JSW Case3:09-cv-01042-JSW Document117-1 Filed04/05/12 Page2 of 2 3. 1 The appearances of Dechert LLP and the other attorneys who individually have 2 entered appearances on behalf of Plaintiff Earl Young shall remain in effect and are not affected 3 by Mr. Purewal's withdrawal. 4 5 IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 7 Dated: April 6 , 2012 HONORABLE JEFFREY S. WHITE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 14399637 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 DECHERT -2- LLP ATTORNEYS AT LAW [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING WITHDRAWAL OF MANROOP PUREWAL As A TIORNEY OF RECORD CASE No. C 09-1042 JSW

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?