Young v. Holmes et al
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS' OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF'S DISCOVERY DESIGNATIONS. Signed by Judge JEFFREY S. WHITE on 3/28/13. (jjoS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 3/28/2013)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
No. C 09-01042 JSW
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’
OBJECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF’S
T. HOLMES, et al.,
The Court has received and considered Plaintiff’s Discovery Designations and
Defendant’s Objections Thereto. The Court rules as follows:
The Court overrules Defendant Bullock’s objections to admission of his response to
Plaintiff’s Request for Admission Number 3.
The Court overrules Defendant Kiplinger’s objections to admission of his response to
Plaintiff’s Request for Admission Numbers 2 and 5, and sustains his objections to admission of
his response to Request for Admission Number 3.
The Court overrules Defendant Buchanan’s objections to admission of his response to
Plaintiff’s Request for Admission Numbers 1 and 3.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: March 28, 2013
JEFFREY S. WHITE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?